咽喉反流性疾病不同体位反流模式的研究

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.098

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨咽喉反流性疾病的不同体位反流模式的特点。方法回顾2016年5月至2023年5月间,在战略支援部队特色医学中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科就诊的987例疑似咽喉反流性疾病(laryngophyngeal reflux disease, LPRD)患者的一般情况、Dx-pH监测数据及反流症状量表(reflux symptom index, RSI)、反流体征量表(reflux finding score, RFS)数据,根据立位和卧位Ryan指数将Ryan指数阳性患者分为单纯立位阳性、单纯卧位阳性及双阳性组,比较各组的RSI、RFS及各项反流参数。采用SPSS 24.0进行统计学分析。结果 987例研究对象中,Ryan指数阳性288例,其中单纯立位阳性176例(61.1%)、单纯卧位阳性47例(16.3%)、双阳性65例(22.6%)。各组间性别及年龄差异无统计学意义,各组RSI数值及阳性率差异无统计学意义(P=0.29,P=0.345),其中症状痰多或涕倒流立位组评分高于卧位组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。各组RFS数值及分项数值差异无统计学意义,RFS阳性率双阳性组高于卧位组高于立位组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.009)。pH监测参数比较显示:双阳性组的反流时间百分比、反流次数、最长反流时间均显著高于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。立位组在反流时间百分比和最长反流时间两项上显著小于卧位组(P<0.001),但反流总次数两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.357)。结论 LPRD患者中以立位反流模式为主,立位的反流事件的特点是含气反流为主且持续时间较短,其对气道黏膜的损伤作用弱于卧位反流,但引起的患者主观症状较重。

关键词: 咽喉反流, 胃食管反流, 体位, pH监测

Abstract: Objective To explore the characteristics of different postural reflux patterns in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Methods In a retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data of 987 patients with symptoms of LPRD from May 2016 to May 2023. According to the upright and supine Ryan index, patients with positive Ryan index were divided into upright-positive, supine-positive and double-positive groups, and the RSI, RFS and various reflux parameters of each group were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 24.0. Results Among the 987 subjects, 288 cases were positive for Ryan index, of which 176 cases(61.1%)were upright positive, 47 cases(16.3%)were supine positive, and 65 cases(22.6%)were double positive. There was no statistically significant difference in gender and age among the groups, and there was no significant difference in RSI score and positive rate among the groups(P=0.29, P=0.345). The scores for the excess throat mucus or postnasal drip were higher in upright-positive group than in the supine-positive group(P=0.008). There was no significant difference in RFS scores and sub-items among the groups, but the positive rate of RFS in the double-positive group was higher than that in the supine-positive and upright-positive groups(P=0.009). Comparison of pH monitoring parameters showed that the percentage of reflux time, the number of refluxes, and the longest reflux time were significantly higher in the double-positive group than in the other two groups(P<0.001). The percentage of reflux time and the longest reflux time in the upright group were significantly shorter than those in the supine group(P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the total number of refluxes between the two groups(P=0.357). Conclusion The upright reflux pattern is predominant in the LPRD patiens. Upright relux events are characterised by air-containing reflux and short duration. Upright reflux was less damaging to the mucosa, but could cause more serious subjective symptoms.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Gastroesophageal reflux, Posture, pH monitoring

中图分类号:

R766.5

孙喆喆,王刚,王磊,李保卫,韩浩伦,刘红丹,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流性疾病不同体位反流模式的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 91-95.

SUN Zhezhe, WANG Gang, WANG Lei, LI Baowei, HAN Haolun, LIU Hongdan, ZHANG Xiaoli, WU Wei. Influence of body positions on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2024, 38(6): 91-95.

参考文献

[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组. 咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(5): 324-326. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.002
[2] 孙喆喆, 吴玮, 王刚. 管腔内pH监测在反流性疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 90-94.doi: 10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.036 SUN Zhezhe, WU Wei, WANG Gang. Utility of intraluminal pH monitoring in reflux diseases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(6): 90-94. doi: 10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.036
[3] Wang G, Qu CM, Wang L, et al. Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2019, 139(3): 299-303. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280
[4] 王磊, 李保卫, 王刚, 等. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间碱反流初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(6): 75-79, 92. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.138 WANG Lei, LI Baowei, WANG Gang, et al. A preliminary study on nocturnal alkali reflux in OSAHS patients[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(6): 75-79, 92. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.138
[5] Nian YY, Feng C, Jing FC, et al. Reflux characteristics of 113 GERD patients with abnormal 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH tests[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2015, 16(9): 805-810. doi:10.1631/jzus.B1500027
[6] Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S, Villadolid D, et al. Upright, supine, or bipositional reflux: patterns of reflux do not affect outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(12): 2193-2198. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9333-6
[7] Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ, Hoffmann R, et al. Possible relationship of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux with pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis[J]. Am J Rhinol, 1999, 13(3): 197-202. doi:10.2500/105065899781389777
[8] Mesallam TA, Baqays AA. Characteristics of upright versus supine reflux pattern in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2021, 87(2): 200-204. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.003
[9] Scott DR, Simon RA. Supraesophageal reflux: correlation of position and occurrence of acid reflux-effect of head-of-bed elevation on supine reflux[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2015, 3(3): 356-361. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.019
[10] Guo YZ, Wang G, Li LY, et al. Machine learning aided diagnosis of diseases without clinical gold standard: a new score for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease based on pH monitoring[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 67005-67014. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985494
[11] 郑杰元, 张立红, 李晶兢, 等. 咽喉反流症状指数量表中文版的信度及效度评价 [J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 11(47): 894-898
[12] 韩悦, 张森, 皇甫辉, 等. 咽喉反流性疾病诊断量表的应用进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(4): 313-317. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016 HAN Yue, ZHANG Sen, HUANGFU Hui, et al. The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2023, 37(4): 313-317. doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016
[13] Lechien JR, Akst LM, Hamdan AL, et al. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 160(5): 762-782. doi:10.1177/0194599819827488
[14] 徐志宇, 刘旭, 陈世彩, 等. 咽喉反流性疾病的发病机制及其与耳鼻咽喉疾病相关性研究进展[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2022, 30(6): 587-590. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2022.06.004 XU Zhiyu, LIU Xu, CHEN Shicai, et al. Research progress on the pathogenesis of throat reflux disease and its correlation with otorhinolaryngology diseases[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2022, 30(6): 587-590. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2022.06.004
[15] Hoppo T, Komatsu Y, Nieponice A, et al. Toward an improved understanding of isolated upright reflux: positional effects on the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(7): 1623-1631. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1537-9
[16] Babaei A, Bhargava V, Mittal RK. Upper esophageal sphincter during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation: effects of reflux content and posture[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2010, 298(5): G601-G607. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00486.2009
[17] Lang IM, Medda BK, Shaker R. Effects of esophageal acidification on esophageal reflexes controlling the upper esophageal sphincter[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2019, 316(1): G45-G54. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00292.2018
[18] 孙喆喆, 吴玮, 李连勇, 等. 胃泡大小与咽喉反流性疾病患者反流模式的相关性[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(44): 3487-3493. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.44.008 SUN Zhezhe, WU Wei, LI Lianyong, et al. The correlation between gastric bubble size and laryngopharyngeal reflux pattern in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2019, 99(44): 3487-3493. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.44.008

相关文章 15

[1]	吴玮,王磊,陈升,李连勇,王刚. 胃食管气道反流性疾病多学科研究及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 1-14.
[2]	刘莲莲,李进让. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与咽喉反流[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 15-22.
[3]	张利,张梦茹,阿丽米热·艾尔肯,邱忠民. 咽喉反流性疾病在常见呼吸道疾病中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 23-29.
[4]	胡志伟,陈冬,杨栋,吴继敏. 胃食管气道反流性疾病的诊断和治疗:基于2020~2024年相关共识和指南[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 30-38.
[5]	赵佳宁,崔元馨,王丹,赵明. 咽喉反流与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病的关系及其机制探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 39-45.
[6]	张杉,陈秋,周方伟,马亦飞. 生物标志物在咽喉反流性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 46-54.
[7]	周诗侗,杨艳艳,杨玉成,方红雁. 胃蛋白酶与咽喉反流性疾病:从致病机制到咽喉鳞状细胞癌的潜在风险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 55-60.
[8]	席晓宇,隋昕珂,陈升,李连勇,钟长青. 咽喉反流性疾病的内镜下治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 61-65.
[9]	牛燕燕,顾伟,金晓峰,霍红,杨大海,崔婷婷,王剑. 声带白斑组织中胃蛋白酶的表达分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 66-70.
[10]	王磊,王刚,孙喆喆,刘红丹,韩浩伦,李保卫,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 71-77.
[11]	崔小缓,尹龙龙,张延平,蒋兴旺,李丽娜. 咽喉反流患者唾液菌群与反流症状相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 78-84.
[12]	李逗,隋昕珂,杨小慢,郭红媛,王敏,钟长青,李连勇. 单纯咽喉反流患者食管下段黏膜细胞内镜及病理指标变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 85-90.
[13]	唐秋双,白兴华. 从胃食管反流病角度分析胃与五窍的关系[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 102-108.
[14]	王磊,李保卫,王刚,刘红丹,韩浩伦,张晓丽,吴玮. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间碱反流初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(6): 75-79.
[15]	王钰彧,朱梅. 体位性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床特点及其与低觉醒阈值的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(6): 101-105.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed