山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 23-28.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.308

• 论著 • 上一篇    

低频振动剪切应激治疗单侧前庭功能低下患者的疗效分析

赵真1,郑贵亮2,王俊1,张丙文1   

  1. 1.南京医科大学附属南京医院/南京市第一医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 江苏 南京 210006;
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 上海 200092
  • 发布日期:2025-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 张丙文. E-mail:njsdyyyzbw@163.com

Analysis of the curative efficacy of low-frequency vibration shear stress on patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction

ZHAO Zhen1, ZHENG Guiliang2, WANG Jun1, ZHANG Bingwen1   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu, China2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Published:2025-01-17

摘要: 目的 探讨低频振动剪切应激治疗单侧前庭功能低下患者的疗效。 方法 选择被诊断为单侧前庭功能低下的患者152例。所有患者既往病史均为前庭神经元炎且伴有眩晕后遗症。根据治疗方法将其分为低频振动治疗组、前庭康复治疗组,每组各76例。低频振动治疗组于患侧乳突进行100 Hz 低频振动,前庭康复治疗组则给予常规康复训练。两组患者均持续治疗2周。治疗前及治疗后的第2周复诊完成相关评分测试。采用头晕残障功能评分(dizziness handicap inventory, DHI)及眩晕视觉模拟评分(visual vertigo analogue scale, VVAS),其中DHI评分分别计算三个子维度得分即躯体评分(DHI-P)、情感评分(DHI-E)、功能评分(DHI-F)以及总分DHI-T),评价低频振动治疗在单侧前庭功能低下患者中眩晕康复的作用。 结果 按照DHI总分改善18分以上为有效,对研究所得数据进行统计分析后,得出低频振动治疗组和前庭康复治疗组的总有效率分别为77.63%、82.89%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.415);低频振动治疗和前庭康复组治疗前及治疗后的DHI-P、DHI-E、DHI-F、DHI-T 以及VVAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。 结论 经乳突低频振动与常规康复训练的疗效差异无统计学意义,且不会引起明显副作用。但前庭康复锻炼对康复师以及康复场地均有较高要求,而低频振动治疗法克服了上述局限,且可行性更高,易于普遍开展。

关键词: 低频振动, 剪切应激, 前庭功能低下, 眩晕

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect and value of low frequency vibration on vestibular rehabilitation in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Methods From July, 2019 to December, 2023, all patients admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of our Hospital with a history of vestibular neuritis and sequelae of vertigo were diagnosed with unilateral vestibular dysfunction. 152 patients were randomly divided into low-frequency vibration therapy group and vestibular rehabilitation therapy group, excluding patients with poor medical compliance and lost to follow-up, there were 76 cases in each group. The patients in the low-frequency vibration treatment group were treated with 100 Hz low-frequency vibration through the affected side mastoid for 2 weeks. Patients in the vestibular rehabilitation treatment group were received routine rehabilitation training for 2 weeks. The relevant score tests were performed before treatment and at the 2nd week after treatment. We performed a comparative statistical analysis of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory(DHI)and the Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale(VVAS)before and after treatment, respectively. The DHI score was calculated with three sub-dimensions, namely soma score(DHI-P), emotion score(DHI-E), function score(DHI-F)and total score(DHI-T), and then to evaluate the value of low-frequency vibration therapy on vertigo rehabilitation in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Results The total DHI score improvement of more than 18 points was effective. The total effective rate was 77.63% in the low-frequency vibration treatment group and 82.89% in the vestibular rehabilitation group, with no statistical significance(P=0.415). There were significant differences in the scores of DHI-P, DHI-E, DHI-F, DHI-T and VVAS in the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores between the low-frequency vibration treatment and vestibular rehabilitation groups(P<0.01). Conclusion The effective rates between the two groups of low-frequency vibration delivered to the mastoid process and the conventional vestibular rehabilitation exercises in improving vertigo symptoms are equivalent, and low-frequency vibration delivered to the mastoid process has no other adverse effects on patients. However, compared with vestibular rehabilitation exercises that require professional rehabilitators and professional sites, low-frequency vibration therapy for vertigo rehabilitation in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction is simple to operate, has no special site requirements, and has little difficulty in technician training.

Key words: Low-frequency vibration, Shear stress, Vestibular hypofunction, Vertigo

中图分类号: 

  • R764.35
[1] Quatman-Yates CC, Hunter-Giordano A, Shimamura KK, et al. Physical therapy evaluation and treatment after concussion/mild traumatic brain injury[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2020, 50(4): CPG1-CPG73. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.0301
[2] García-Muñoz C, Cortés-Vega MD, Heredia-Rizo AM, et al. Effectiveness of vestibular training for balance and dizziness rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(2): 590. doi:10.3390/jcm9020590
[3] Huang TC, Wang SJ, Kheradmand A. Vestibular migraine: an update on current understanding and future directions[J]. Cephalalgia, 2020, 40(1): 107-121. doi:10.1177/0333102419869317
[4] Weidt S, Bruehl AB, Straumann D, et al. Health-related quality of life and emotional distress in patients with dizziness: a cross-sectional approach to disentangle their relationship[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2014, 14: 317. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-317
[5] Arnold SA, Stewart AM, Moor HM, et al. The effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation interventions in treating unilateral peripheral vestibular disorders: a systematic review[J]. Physiother Res Int, 2017, 22(3). doi:10.1002/pri.1635
[6] Hillier S, McDonnell M. Is vestibular rehabilitation effective in improving dizziness and function after unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction? An abridged version of a Cochrane Review[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2016, 52(4): 541-556
[7] Lilios A, Chimona T, Nikitas C, et al. The effect of supervision in vestibular rehabilitation in patients with acute or chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction: a systematic review[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2021, 42(10): 1422-1431. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003354
[8] Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, et al. Vestibular rehabilitation for peripheral vestibular hypofunction: an updated clinical practice guideline from the academy of neurologic physical therapy of the American physical therapy association[J]. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2022, 46(2): 118-177. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000382
[9] Pyykko I. Outcomes of endolymphatic shunt surgery in ménière's disease indicate potential contribution of shear stress instead of relieving the endolymphatic Hydrops[J]. Otolaryngology, 2014, 4(3). doi:10.4172/2161-119x.1000171
[10] 邹静,Ilmari Pyykkö.内淋巴囊手术治疗梅尼埃病与剪切应激反应[J].中华耳科学杂志,2012,10(2):255-259. doi:10.3969/i.issn.1672-2922.2012.02.028
[11] Zou J, Peng R, Zheng G, et al. Improvement in the inner ear symptoms of patients with Meniere's disease after treatment using low-frequency vibration: a preliminary report[J]. Edorium Journal of Otolaryngology, 2015. doi:10.5348/O04-2015-5-OA-2
[12] 彭日顺子, 郑贵亮, 张青, 等. 低频旋转乳突振动对正常志愿者听力的影响[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2015, 13(1): 110-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2015.01.021 PENG Rishunzi, ZHENG Guiliang, ZHANG Qing, et al. Effects of rotatory low-frequency mastoid vibrations on auditory function in normal volunteers[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2015, 13(1): 110-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2015.01.021
[13] Shepard NT, Jacobson GP. The caloric irrigation test[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2016, 137: 119-131. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63437-5.00009-1
[14] 张祎, 刘博, 王拥军, 等. 头晕评价量表中文版信度和效度分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 50(9): 738-743. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.09.008 ZHANG Yi, LIU Bo, WANG Yongjun, et al. Analysis of reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Dizziness Handicap Inventory(DHI)[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2015, 50(9): 738-743. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2015.09.008
[15] Dannenbaum E, Chilingaryan G, Fung J. Visual vertigo analogue scale: an assessment ouestionnaire for visual Vertigo[J]. Journal of Vestibular Research, 2011, 21(3): 153-159
[16] 余海芸, 刘小龙, 李衍菲,等. 视觉性眩晕量表的汉化及信效度分析[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2019, 17(3): 371-375. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.03.018 YU Haiyun, LIU Xiaolong, LI Yanfei, et al. The chinese translation and reliability and validity analysis of the visual vertigo scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology, 2019,17(3):371-375. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.03.018
[17] 祁晓媛, 宋宁, 顾平, 等. 前庭康复机制及治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(11): 1399-1405. doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.104 QI Xiaoyuan, SONG Ning, GU Ping, et al. Research advances in vestibular rehabilitation mechanism and treatment[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(11): 1399-1405. doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.104
[18] Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, et al. Vestibular rehabilitation for peripheral vestibular hypofunction: an updated clinical practice guideline from the academy of neurologic physical therapy of the American physical therapy association[J]. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2022, 46(2): 118-177. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000382
[19] García-Muñoz C, Cortés-Vega MD, Heredia-Rizo AM, et al. Effectiveness of vestibular training for balance and dizziness rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(2): 590. doi:10.3390/jcm9020590
[20] Sulway S, Whitney SL. Advances in vestibular rehabilitation[J]. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 82: 164-169. doi:10.1159/000490285
[21] Dunlap PM, Holmberg JM, Whitney SL. Vestibular rehabilitation: advances in peripheral and central vestibular disorders[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2019, 32(1): 137-144. doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000632
[22] 杨军,郑贵亮. 外周前庭疾病的诊断和治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5):1-6. doi: 10.6040/i.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.074 YANG Jun, ZHENG Guiliang. Diagnosis and management of peripheral vestibular diseases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(5): 1-6. doi: 10.6040/i.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.074
[23] Allum JH, Honegger F. Vibro-tactile and auditory balance biofeedback changes muscle activity patterns: possible implications for vestibularimplants[J]. J Vestib Res, 2017, 27(1): 77-87. doi:10.3233/VES-170601
[24] Toshishige Y, Kondo M, Kabaya K, et al. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic subjective dizziness: Predictors of improvement in Dizziness Handicap Inventory at 6 months posttreatment[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2020, 140(10): 827-832. doi:10.1080/00016489.2020.1772994
[25] Lilios A, Chimona T, Nikitas C, et al. The effect of supervision in vestibular rehabilitation in patients with acute or chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction: a systematic review[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2021, 42(10): e1422-e1431. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003354
[26] Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, et al. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria1[J]. J Vestib Res, 2022, 32(1): 1-6. doi:10.3233/VES-201644
[27] Teixido M, Casserly R, Melley LE. Lateral modified brandt-daroff exercises: a novel home treatment technique for horizontal canal BPPV[J]. J Int Adv Otol, 2021, 17(1): 52-57. doi:10.5152/iao.2020.9452
[28] Koc A, Cevizci Akkılıc E. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation in the management of patients with and without vestibular migraine[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 88(3): S25-S33. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.07.011
[29] 中国老年医学学会眩晕/前庭医学分会, 国家卫生健康委员会能力建设和继续教育中心耳鼻喉科专家委员会. 前庭疾病前庭康复专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(14): 1097-1107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20231129-01237 Chinese Geriatrics Society for Vestibular Disorders Expert Committee on Otolaryngology, National Health Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center.Expert consensus on vestibular rehabilitation in vestibular disorders[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2024, 104(14): 1097-1107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20231129-01237
[1] 周熠星,李丹,陈腾宇,周敏,黄家钱,王森,罗诗威,何伟平. 近现代名老中医治疗眩晕用药规律的数据挖掘探析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 11-20.
[2] 许嘉, 李欣, 陈雯婧, 高娟娟, 卢星星, 伊海金. 联合应用内淋巴囊减压和局部激素治疗难治性梅尼埃病的短期与长期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(4): 17-21.
[3] 张瑶瑶,王海涛. 内耳钆造影磁共振成像技术在梅尼埃病诊疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 101-107.
[4] 蒋黎娜,于倩如,于杰,关本岭,鹿玉,于淑东. 前庭性眩晕疾病患者焦虑和抑郁状况研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(6): 1-5.
[5] 杨军,郑贵亮. 外周前庭疾病的诊断和治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 1-6.
[6] 刘宇鹏,梁敏,何景春,郑贵亮,李姝娜,张青,杨军. 梅尼埃病前庭功能分级的探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 14-19.
[7] 刘宇鹏,吴文瑾,何景春,郑贵亮,张青,杨军. 迷路后径路前庭神经切断术治疗难治性梅尼埃病75例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 46-50.
[8] 陈建勇, 孙夏雨, 沈佳丽, 汪玮, 王璐, 贺宽, 张勤, 马孝宝, 沈敏, 陈向平, 杨军. 原发性良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者VEMP异常率的临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 51-55.
[9] 邓巧媚,王巍,温超,刘强,毛翔,韩曦,李姗姗,陈太生,徐开旭,林鹏. 头晕眩晕与眼震强度的关系研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 56-60.
[10] 郑贵亮, 刘凌峰, 陈建勇, 张青, 杨军. 基于移动互联网的前庭康复训练指导平台的开发与应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 78-81.
[11] 赵欢娣,成颖,杨军,张青. 3D-FLAIR MRI在内耳出血所致的SSNHL诊断中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 97-101.
[12] 魏馨雨,杨方园,杨军,张青. 耳源性细菌性迷路炎研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 102-107.
[13] 王玥, 上官翰京, 蔡成福. 睡眠对良性阵发性位置性眩晕影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(5): 108-112.
[14] 伊海金,杨仕明. 重视耳部外伤诊疗工作[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 1-3.
[15] 许嘉,伊海金. 正确处理颞骨骨折耳科并发症[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(1): 4-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!