山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 40-46.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.279

• • 上一篇    下一篇

苏皖地区变应性鼻炎患者气传变应原皮肤点刺试验和血清特异性IgE检测的一致性及相关性分析

杨晴1,陆美萍1,2,程雷1,2,3   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院 耳鼻咽喉科, 江苏 南京 210029;
    2. 南京医科大学第一附属医院/江苏省人民医院 过敏诊疗中心, 江苏 南京 210029;
    3. 南京医科大学 国际变态反应研究中心, 江苏 南京 210029
  • 发布日期:2021-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 程雷. E-mail:chenglei@jsph.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京医学奖励基金会项目(YXJL-2017-0191-0062)

Agreement and association analyses of skin prick testing and serum specific IgE assay for aeroallergen detection in patients with allergic rhinitis from Jiangsu and Anhui areas

YANG Qing1, LU Meiping1,2, CHENG Lei1,2,3   

  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    3. International Centre for Allergy Research, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2021-02-01

PDF (PC)

430

摘要： 目的 基于皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和血清特异性IgE(sIgE)检测方法分析变应性鼻炎(AR)患者常见气传变应原,评估该两种检测方法所得结果的一致性及相关性。 方法 纳入苏皖地区AR患者101例,其中男53例,女48例;4~68岁,平均(38.5±14.8)岁。均同时进行10种气传变应原SPT和sIgE检测,包括6种常年性室内变应原(粉尘螨、户尘螨、猫毛、狗毛、德国小蠊、链格孢霉)和4种季节性花粉变应原(桦树、豚草、葎草和蒿草)。采用SPSS 24.0软件对检测结果进行一致性及相关性分析。 结果 101例AR患者中,10种气传变应原SPT和sIgE检测结果的一致率(符合率)分别为粉尘螨75.28%、户尘螨72.09%、链格孢霉39.13%、猫毛36.84%、狗毛11.11%、葎草14.29%、德国小蠊12.50%、豚草22.22%、蒿草13.33%、桦树15.38%。Cohen's kappa系数分析显示,kappa值介于0.146~0.484之间,链格孢霉、猫毛、粉尘螨的kappa值分别为0.484、0.471、0.413,具有中等强度一致性;户尘螨、豚草、桦树的kappa值分别为0.398、0.330、0.215,一致性强度一般;其余4种变应原的kappa值均<0.20,一致性强度差。Spearman秩相关性分析显示,10种气传变应原的SPT分级与sIgE分级均呈正相关,rs值介于0.174~0.548之间,其中粉尘螨、链格孢霉、猫毛、户尘螨的rs值分别为0.548、0.532、0.483、0.440,具有中等程度相关;葎草、桦树、狗毛的rs值分别为0.240、0.239、0.210,为弱相关;其余3种变应原的rs值均<0.20,为极弱相关。 结论 苏皖地区AR患者常见气传变应原SPT和sIgE检测结果的一致性、相关性存在较大差异,建议进行变应原体内外联合检测以提高临床诊断的准确性。

关键词: 变应性鼻炎, 变应原, 皮肤点刺试验, 特异性IgE, 一致性, 相关性

Abstract: Objective To assess the agreement and association between skin prick testing(SPT)and serum specific IgE(sIgE)in detecting common aeroallergens in patients with allergic rhinitis(AR). Methods The study included 101 patients(53 males and 48 females; age range: 4 to 68 years, average age: 38.5±14.8 years)from the Jiangsu and Anhui Provinces who received treatment for AR in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from November 2018 to December 2019. All the patients simultaneously underwent SPT and sIgE for the detection of 10 aeroallergens; these included 6 perennial indoor allergens(Dermatophagoides farina, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat dander, dog dander, Blattella germanica, and Alternaria alternate)and 4 seasonal pollen allergens(birch, ragweed, humulus, and Artemisia ［A. annua or A. argyi］). Meanwhile, the results of the allergen detection were analyzed by SPSS 24.0 software. Results The agreement percentages of the detections of D. farina, D. pteronyssinus, A. alternata, cat dander, dog dander, humulus, B. germanica, ragweed, Artemisia, and birch by SPT and sIgE were 75.28%, 72.09%, 39.13%, 36.84%, 11.11%, 14.29%, 12.50%, 22.22%, 13.33%, and 15.38%, respectively. Cohen's kappa statistics showed that the κ-coefficients were between 0.146 and 0.484. Among them, the κ-coefficients of A. alternata, cat dander, and D. farina were 0.484, 0.471, and 0.413, respectively, which indicated moderate agreements. The κ-coefficients of D. pteronyssinus, ragweed, and birch were 0.398, 0.330, and 0.215, respectively, which indicated lower agreements. All the κ-coefficients of the other four allergens were less than 0.20, indicating poor agreement. Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the SPT and sIgE results for the detection of the 10 aeroallergens(rs ranged from 0.174 to 0.548). The rs values of D. farina, A. alternata, cat dander, and D. pteronyssinus were 0.548, 0.532, 0.483, and 0.440, respectively, indicating moderate correlations. The rs values of humulus, birch, and dog dander were 0.240, 0.239, and 0.210, respectively, indicating poor correlations. The rs values of the other three allergens were all < 0.20, indicating very poor correlation. Conclusion This study demonstrated large discrepancies in the agreement and association between the SPT and sIgE detections of common aeroallergens in patients with AR in the Jiangsu and Anhui areas. The combination of in vivo and in vitro methods for allergen testing is recommended to improve the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of AR.

Key words: Allergic rhinitis, Allergens, Skin prick test, Specific IgE, Agreement, Association

中图分类号: 

  • R765.21
[1] Douglass JA, O'Hehir RE. 1. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of allergic disease: the basics[J]. Med J Aust, 2006, 185(4):228-233. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00539.x
[2] Bro(·overz)ek JL, Bousquet J, Agache I, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma(ARIA)guidelines-2016 revision[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2017, 140(4):950-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050.
[3] Krouse JH, Mabry RL. Skin testing for inhalant allergy 2003: current strategies[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2003, 129(Suppl 4):33-49. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)01398-6.
[4] Gendo K, Larson EB. Evidence-based diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected allergic rhinitis[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 140(4):278-289. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-4-200402170-00010.
[5] Szeinbach SL, Harpe SE, Williams PB, et al. Testing for allergic disease: parameters considered and test value[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2008, 9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-47
[6] Bulat Lokas S, Plavec D, RikicPiskoviic J, et al. Allergen-Specific IgE Measurement: Intermethod Comparison of Two Assay Systems in Diagnosing Clinical Allergy[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2017, 31(3):e22047. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22047.
[7] Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, et al. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper[J]. World Allergy Organ J, 2020, 13(2):100080.. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080.
[8] 钱俊俊, 周文成, 吴中飞, 等. 苏皖地区变应性鼻炎患者吸入性变应原谱分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(3):147-151. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.036. QIAN Junjun, ZHOU Wencheng, WU Zhongfei, et al. Analysis of sensitization to inhalant allergens in patients with allergic rhinitis from Jiangsu and Anhui areas[J]. Journal of Qtolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(3):147-151. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2019.036.
[9] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2015年, 天津)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(1):6-24. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860. 2016.01.004.
[10] Schoos AMM, Chawes BLK, Følsgaard NV, et al. Disagreement between skin prick test and specific IgE in young children[J]. Allergy, 2015, 70(1):41-48. doi: 10.1111/all.12523.
[11] Knight V, Wolf ML, Trikha A, et al. A comparison of specific IgE and skin prick test results to common environmental allergens using the HYTECTM 288[J]. J Immunol Methods, 2018, 462:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.07.005.
[12] Cho JH, Suh JD, Kim JK, et al. Correlation between skin-prick testing, individual specific IgE tests, and a multiallergen IgE assay for allergy detection in patients with chronic rhinitis[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2014, 28(5):388-391. doi:10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4074.
[13] Srisuwatchari W, Kwanthong P, Bunnag C, et al. Association between skin prick test and serum specific immunoglobulin E to American cockroach allergens in allergic rhinitis patients[J]. Allergol Immunopathol(Madr), 2020, 48(2):170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.07.007.
[14] Chauveau A, Dalphin ML, Mauny F, et al. Skin prick tests and specific IgE in 10-year-old children: Agreement and association with allergic diseases[J]. Allergy, 2017, 72(9):1365-1373. doi:10.1111/all.13148.
[15] Chu HT, Godin I, Phuc'n'g NT, et al. Evaluation of skin prick test to screen dust mite sensitization in chronic respiratory diseases in Southern Vietnam[J]. Asia Pac Allergy, 2018, 8(4):e39. doi:10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e39.
[16] Wagner N, Rudert M. Sensitivity and specificity of standardised allergen extracts in skin prick test for diagnoses of IgE-mediated respiratory allergies[J]. Clin Transl Allergy, 2019, 9:8. doi:10.1186/s13601-019-0248-9.
[17] Wang J, Godbold JH, Sampson HA. Correlation of serum allergy(IgE)tests performed by different assay systems[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2008, 121(5):1219-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.1150.
[18] Siles RI, Hsieh FH. Allergy blood testing: A practical guide for clinicians[J]. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78(9):585-592. doi:10.3949/ccjm.78a.11023.
[19] Cox L. Overview of serological-specific IgE antibody testing in children[J]. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011;11(6):447-453. doi:10.1007/s11882-011-0226-3.
[20] Calabria CW, Dietrich J, Hagan L. Comparison of serum-specific IgE(ImmunoCAP)and skin-prick test results for 53 inhalant allergens in patients with chronic rhinitis[J]. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2009, 30(4):386-396. doi:10.2500/aap.2009.30.3258.
[21] Cobbaert CM, Jonker GJ. Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer—a clinical evaluation study[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2005, 43(7):772-781. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2005.132.
[22] Frith J, Fleming L, Bossley C, et al. The complexities of defining atopy in severe childhood asthma[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2011, 41(7):948-953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03729.x.
[23] Ollert M, Weissenbacher S, Rakoski J, Ring J. Allergen-specific IgE measured by a continuous random-access immunoanalyzer: interassay comparison and agreement with skin testing[J]. Clin Chem, 2005, 51(7):1241-1249. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.046565.
[24] Ciprandi G, De Amici M, Giunta V, et al. Comparison of serum specific IgE and skin prick test in polysensitized patients[J]. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 2010, 23(4):1293-1295. doi:10.1177/039463201002300438.
[25] Park KH, Lee J, Lee SC, et al. Comparison of the ImmunoCAP Assay and AdvanSureTM AlloScreen Advanced Multiplex Specific IgE Detection Assay[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2017, 58(4):786-792. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.786.
[26] 付婉艺. 中国蒿属花粉过敏原分子生物学分析和组分诊断[D]. 浙江大学, 2018.
[27] Katial RK, Lin FL, Stafford WW, et al. Mugwort and sage(Artemisia)pollen cross-reactivity: ELISA inhibition and immunoblot evaluation[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 1997, 79(4):340-346. doi:10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63025-6.
[1] 程雷,许秋艳,陈浩. 变态反应检测与诊断的临床应用及意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 1-6.
[2] 倪璟滋,万文锦,程雷. 变应性鼻炎健康相关生活质量研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 110-115.
[3] 林一杭,李幼瑾. 肠道微生态在儿童变应性鼻炎中的研究现状[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 116-122.
[4] 刘真,宋西成. 细胞焦亡在变应性鼻炎中的作用机制及研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 123-129.
[5] 王娜,柴向斌. 前列腺源性ETS因子在哮喘及鼻黏膜炎性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 136-141.
[6] 刘一潼,周穗子,邱前辉. NLRP3炎症小体在慢性鼻窦炎和变应性鼻炎中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 142-146.
[7] 龚霄阳,程雷. 新冠疫情期间基于门诊患者的变应性鼻炎患者比例构成分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 245-255.
[8] 鹿伟理,姜涛,李宪华. 多重致敏儿童变应性鼻炎患者sIgE特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 260-265.
[9] 黄开月,李雪情,韩国鑫,张勤修. 基于“肺脾”理论指导穴位埋线治疗变应性鼻炎的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 266-274.
[10] 朱正茹, 张小兵. 中药汤剂结合常规西药治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 281-289.
[11] 王菲,刘钰莹,肖麒祎,丁健,高尚,毛薇. 住院医师精神心理因素与变应性鼻炎的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 28-31.
[12] 刘寨，应民政. 环状RNA在变应性鼻炎中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(5): 105-112.
[13] 林小燕,李静,马志祺,李依琳,高馨怡,李勇. 益生菌治疗变应性鼻炎的临床疗效及抗变态反应作用Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 70-80.
[14] 汪峘,张殷杰,黄庆峰,施乐娟,陈向平. 上海市崇明地区成年人鼻阻力和鼻声反射的初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 56-60.
[15] 杨艳艳, 杨玉娟, 宋西成. 芳香烃受体抑制变应性鼻炎Th17免疫应答的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(1): 109-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张晗,黄一飞 . 抗角膜移植排斥的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 84 -87 .
[2] 牛善利,柴茂文,李振秀 . 鼻内镜下鼻甲成形术治疗慢性肥厚性鼻炎60例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2006, 20(1): 16 -18 .
[3] 孟庆国,卢永田,范献良 . 杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体基因多态性与鼻咽癌的关联性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 196 -199 .
[4] 马玉起,孔祥春 . 先天性双侧下唇窦道1例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 199 -199 .
[5] 万俐佳,鲁海涛,姜义道,刘 辉,李 琴,佘腊枝 . 改良腭咽成形术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征41例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 204 -205 .
[6] 于青青 ,王跃建 . 硬质耳内镜的临床应用进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 222 -224 .
[7] 吉晓滨,邓家德,臧林泉,王 磊,谢 军 . 豚鼠变应性鼻炎模型血清组胺的测定[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 228 -230 .
[8] 向登,卢永田,孙焕吉 . 鼻内镜下修补脑脊液鼻漏19例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 234 -236 .
[9] 邱恩惠,李志春,方文旭 . 嗅觉障碍的中西医治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 253 -257 .
[10] 殷国华,钟 笑 . 激光减容术治疗舌扁桃体肥大的远期疗效[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2008, 22(3): 280 -282 .
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发