山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 71-77.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2023.028

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究

王磊1,王刚1,2,孙喆喆1,刘红丹1,韩浩伦1,李保卫1,张晓丽1,吴玮1,2   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军总医院第九医学中心 耳鼻喉科, 北京 100101;
    2.国家环境保护环境感观应激与健康重点实验室, 北京 100101
  • 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 吴玮. E-mail:ent306ww@126.com

Correlations between vocal cord hyperplastic lesions, vocal cord leukoplakia, chronic laryngopharyngitis, and laryngopharyngeal reflux

WANG Lei1, WANG Gang1,2, SUN Zhezhe1, LIU Hongdan1, HAN Haolun1, LI Baowei1, ZHANG Xiaoli1, WU Wei1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, the Ninth Medical Centerof Chinses PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100101, China2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratony of Enrironmental Sense Organ Stress and Health, Beijing 100101, China
  • Published:2024-12-13

摘要: 目的 对比慢性咽喉炎探讨三种声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑与咽喉反流相关性。 方法 回顾分析声带息肉92例、声带囊肿24例、任克水肿37例、声带白斑53例、慢性咽喉炎106例患者的反流相关量表评分、口咽pH监测结果,比较各组咽喉反流阳性率及反流相关参数差异,并纳入年龄、性别、烟酒嗜好进行多因素Logistic回归分析。 结果 声带占位病变(良性增生性病变+白斑)较慢性咽喉炎组量表阳性率、口咽pH监测Ryan指数阳性率、W指数阳性率、pH6.0反流百分比时间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。白斑组反流症状指数量表阳性率最低,pH监测相关参数均高于良性增生性病变各组,结果存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。声带囊肿组W指数阳性率及W值仅次于白斑组。多因素分析,除了高龄、男性、吸烟,LPR是声带白斑的独立危险因素;以W指数为标准时,LPR是声带囊肿的危险因素。 结论 咽喉反流与多种声带病变相关,声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑较非占位性咽喉炎与咽喉反流关系更密切,尤其声带白斑相关性最大。声带囊肿与LPR关系仍需进一步验证。

关键词: 咽喉反流, 声带增生性病变, 声带白斑, 口咽pH监测

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between vocal cord hyperplastic lesions, vocal cord leukoplakia, chronic laryngopharyngitis, and laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR). Methods A retrospective analysis of 153 patients with benign vocal cord hyperplastic lesions(including 92 cases of vocal cord polyps, 24 cases of vocal cord cyst, and 37 cases of Reinke’s edema), 53 patients with vocal cord leukoplakia, and 106 patients with chronic laryngopharyngitis was performed. Reflux symptom index(RSI), reflux finding score(RFS), and oropharyngeal pH monitoring results were analyzed. The positive rate of LPR and the reflux-related indexes of each group were compared. Multi-factor logistic regression analysis was performed and included age, sex, smoking, and drinking habits. Results The prevalence of LPR in the vocal cord lesion group(benign vocal cord hyperplastic lesions and leukoplakia)was significantly higher than in the laryngopharyngitis group, according to the RSI, RFS, Ryan score, W score, and other parameters of oropharyngeal pH monitoring(P<0.05). The leukoplakia group had the lowest positive rate of RSI, but the reflux-related parameters of pH monitoring were significantly higher than those in other groups(P<0.05). The positive rate and W score in the vocal cord cyst group were second to those in the leukoplakia group. Multivariate analysis showed that LPR was an independent risk factor for leukoplakia, except for old age, male, and smoking. LPR was also a risk factor for vocal cord cysts when W score was considered as the standard. Conclusions LPR is associated with a variety of laryngeal diseases. Vocal cord hyperplastic lesions and leukoplakia are related to LPR more closely than laryngopharyngitis disease, especially leukoplakia. Further studies to validate the relationship between vocal cord cysts and LPR are necessary.

Key words: Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Vocal cord hyperplastic lesions, Vocal cord leukoplakia, Dx-pH monitoring

中图分类号: 

  • R766.5
[1] Lechien JR, Saussez S, Nacci A, et al. Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and benign vocal folds lesions: a systematic review[J]. The Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(9): E329-E341. doi:10.1002/lary.27932
[2] Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders[J]. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2000, 123(4): 385-388. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.109935
[3] Lee YS, Choi SH, Son YI, et al. Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2011, 268(6): 863-869. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1475-9
[4] Naunheim MR, Carroll TL. Benign vocal fold lesions: update on nomenclature, cause, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 25(6): 453-458. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000408
[5] 郑杰元, 张立红, 李晶兢, 等. 咽喉反流症状指数量表中文版的信度及效度评价[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(11): 894-898. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.11.004. ZHENG Jieyuan, ZHANG Lihong, LI Jingjing, et al. Chinese version of the reflux symtom index was evaluated for reliability and validity[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2012, 47(11): 894-898. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2012.11.004
[6] 李进让, Peter C Belafsky, 张立红. 中国喉科医师应用反流体征评分量表的信度研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2012, 19(7): 388-390. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2012.07.017 LI Jinrang, Belafsky PC, ZHANG Lihong. Reliability of the reflux finding score used in Chinese laryngologist[J]. Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2012, 19(7): 388-390. doi:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2012.07.017
[7] 吴玮, 王刚, 王磊, 等. Ryan指数在诊断咽喉反流性疾病中的探讨[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 52(12): 885-889. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.12.002 WU Wei, WANG Gang, WANG Lei, et al. Ryan index for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2017, 52(12): 885-889. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.12.002
[8] Guo YZ, Wang G, Li LY, et al. Machine learning aided diagnosis of diseases without clinical gold standard: a new score for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease based on pH monitoring[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 67005-67014. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985494
[9] Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, et al. A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2009, 13(8): 1422-1429. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0915-6
[10] Lechien JR, Saussez S, Schindler A, et al. Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. The Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(5): 1174-1187. doi:10.1002/lary.27591
[11] Lechien JR, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Dequanter D, et al. Validity and reliability of the reflux sign assessment[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2020, 129(4): 313-325. doi:10.1177/0003489419888947
[12] Wang G, Qu CM, Wang L, et al. Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2019, 139(3): 299-303. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280
[13] Zhang M, Chia C, Stanley C, et al. Diagnostic utility of salivary pepsin as compared with 24-hour dual pH/impedance probe in laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021, 164(2): 375-380. doi:10.1177/0194599820951183
[14] Vance D, Park J, Alnouri G, et al. Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux: a comparison between 24-hour pH impedance testing and pharyngeal probe(restech)testing, with introduction of the sataloff score[J]. J Voic, 2023, 37(5): 737-747. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.002
[15] Parsel SM, Wu EL, Riley CA, et al. Gastroesophageal and laryngopharyngeal reflux associated with laryngeal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 17(7): 1253-1264.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.028
[16] 王嘉森, 吴慕坤, 李进让. 喉癌和声带白斑患者并发咽喉反流的观察研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 53(8): 587-591. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.08.006 WANG Jiasen, WU Mukun, LI Jinrang. Observational study on patients with laryngeal cancer and/or vocal leukoplakia concurrent with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2018, 53(8): 587-591. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.08.006
[17] Chung JH, Tae K, Lee YS, et al. The significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux in benign vocal mucosal lesions[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 141(3): 369-373. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.05.033
[18] 严森, 徐文, 李赟, 等. 咽喉反流与嗓音疾病的相关分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2014, 22(1): 34-38. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2014.01.010 YAN Sen, XU Wen, LI Yun, et al. Correlation of laryngopharyngeal reflux and voice disorders[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 2014, 22(1): 34-38. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2014.01.010
[19] Lechien JR, Schindler A, Robotti C, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in singers: Pathophysiology, clinical findings and perspectives of a new patient-reported outcome instrument[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2019, 136(3): 39-43. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.008
[20] 胡鸿敏, 余林, 傅然, 等. 咽喉反流与声带息肉相关性的病例对照研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 55(8): 774-778. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200515-00415 HU Hongmin, YU Lin, FU Ran, et al. Case-control survey on relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux and vocal fold polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2020, 55(8): 774-778. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200515-00415
[21] Tavaluc R, Tan-geller M. Reinke's edema[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2019, 52(4): 627-635. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2019.03.006
[22] Nacci A, Baracca G, Romeo SO, et al. Endoscopic and phoniatric evaluation in singing students[J]. J Voice, 2019, 33(2): 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.006
[23] Pérez Fernández CA, Preciado López J. Vocal fold nodules. Risk factors in teachers. A case control study design[J]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2003, 54(4): 253-260. doi:10.1016/s0001-6519(03)78412-x
[24] Han HL, Lyu QP, Zhao JH. Laryngopharyngeal reflux in hypertrophic laryngeal diseases[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2022, 101(4): 158-163. doi:10.1177/0145561320953232
[25] Beltsis A, Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, et al. Double probe pH-monitoring findings in patients with benign lesions of the true vocal folds: comparison with typical GERD and the effect of smoking[J]. Eur Arch Otorhino laryngol, 2011, 268(8): 1169-1174. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1572-4
[26] Gong X, Wang XY, Yang L, et al. Detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux by immunohistochemistry of pepsin in the biopsies of vocal fold leukoplakia[J]. J Voice, 2018, 32(3): 352-355. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.010
[27] Lu GW, Ding X, Xu W. Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and vocal fold leukoplakia[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2021, 83(3): 159-166. doi:10.1159/000512527
[28] Friedman M, Hamilton C, Samuelson CG, et al. The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 146(6): 952-958. doi:10.1177/0194599812436952
[29] Xiao SF, Li JR, Zheng HL, et al. An epidemiological survey of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease at the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics in China[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 277(10): 2829-2838. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06045-0
[30] Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. JAMA, 2005, 294(12): 1534-1540. doi:10.1001/jama.294.12.1534
[31] Rutt AL, Wang C, LI Z. Clinicopathologic aspects of vocal fold leukoplakia in smokers and nonsmokers[J]. J Voice, 2021, 35(5): 779-784. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.02.003
[1] 吴玮,王磊,陈升,李连勇,王刚. 胃食管气道反流性疾病多学科研究及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 1-14.
[2] 刘莲莲,李进让. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与咽喉反流[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 15-22.
[3] 张利,张梦茹,阿丽米热·艾尔肯,邱忠民. 咽喉反流性疾病在常见呼吸道疾病中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 23-29.
[4] 胡志伟,陈冬,杨栋,吴继敏. 胃食管气道反流性疾病的诊断和治疗:基于2020~2024年相关共识和指南[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 30-38.
[5] 赵佳宁,崔元馨,王丹,赵明. 咽喉反流与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病的关系及其机制探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 39-45.
[6] 张杉,陈秋,周方伟,马亦飞. 生物标志物在咽喉反流性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 46-54.
[7] 周诗侗,杨艳艳,杨玉成,方红雁. 胃蛋白酶与咽喉反流性疾病:从致病机制到咽喉鳞状细胞癌的潜在风险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 55-60.
[8] 席晓宇,隋昕珂,陈升,李连勇,钟长青. 咽喉反流性疾病的内镜下治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 61-65.
[9] 牛燕燕,顾伟,金晓峰,霍红,杨大海,崔婷婷,王剑. 声带白斑组织中胃蛋白酶的表达分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 66-70.
[10] 王磊,李保卫,王刚,刘红丹,韩浩伦,张晓丽,吴玮. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者夜间碱反流初步研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(6): 75-79.
[11] 周晓庆,闫亚杰,李迎春. 基于肝的生理功能探讨喉喑病治疗思路[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 74-79.
[12] 邵娜,张青青,刘小红,谢萌,郭瑞昕,马思敬,刘海琴,任晓勇,罗花南. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染对症状性咽喉反流患者唾液胃蛋白酶浓度的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 89-95.
[13] 秦铭,孙占伟,王卫卫,李世超,武天义,王广科. 咽喉反流症状或体征评分阳性的慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻内镜术后碱性等渗盐水冲洗的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 147-153.
[14] 曾宪廷,王广科,孙占伟,武天义,李世超,王卫卫. 伴咽喉反流的难治性鼻窦炎术后应用质子泵抑制剂的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 189-194.
[15] 侯波,梁程程,魏东敏,雍蓉,雷大鹏,李梅. 耳鼻咽喉门诊咽喉良性病变老年患者喉镜观察与嗓音声学分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 20-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!