山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 42-48.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.407

• 论著 • 上一篇    

翼管神经切断术在难治性变应性鼻炎中远期临床疗效和安全性

刘怡君,谷悦,官大宇,杨玉成,沈暘   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院 耳鼻咽喉科/过敏性疾病诊疗中心/上气道炎症与肿瘤实验室, 重庆 400016
  • 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 沈暘. E-mail:sy_smile@sina.cn
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市医学科研项目(卫生健康委员会和科技局联合)中青年医学高端人才项目(2023GDRC003);国家自然科学基金(82471131);重庆市自然科学基金(CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0358,CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0642);重庆市科卫联合医学科研重大项目(2024DBXM007)

The long-term clinical efficacy and safety of vidian neurectomy in refractory allergic rhinitis

LIU Yijun, GU Yue, GUAN Dayu, YANG Yucheng, SHEN Yang   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology/ Clinical Allergy Center/ Upper Airway Inflammation and Tumor Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Published:2025-09-19

摘要: 目的 评估翼管神经切断术治疗难治性变应性鼻炎(allergic rhinitic, AR)的远期临床疗效和安全性。 方法 纳入49例难治性AR患者。通过视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分记录翼管神经切断术前及术后1年患者鼻部症状(鼻痒、鼻塞、喷嚏、清涕)严重程度,以评价其临床疗效;采用术后不良反应的记录评价手术安全性;采用患者术前各项临床指标与疗效的相关性分析,探索可能影响疗效的临床指标;应用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计学分析。 结果 翼管神经切断术后1年,患者总体症状和鼻部各症状的VAS评分均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗有效率为85.71%(42/49);术后不良反应发生率10%(5/49);对患者术前各项临床指标与术后疗效相关性分析,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 翼管神经切断术对难治性AR具有确切远期临床疗效和良好安全性,其疗效与术前患者各临床特征均无相关性。

关键词: 翼管神经切断术, 变应性鼻炎, 难治性, 临床疗效, 安全性

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy, safety of vidian neurectomy in the treatment of refractory allergic rhinitis(AR). Methods A total of 49 patients with refractory AR were enrolled in the study. The visual analogue scale(VAS)score was used to assess nasal symptoms-including nasal itching, nasal congestion, sneezing and rhinorrhea-before surgery and 1 years postoperatively. Symptom improvement was compared pre- and post-treatment. Postoperative adverse events were recorded to assess the safety of the procedure. The SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results The VAS scores of both overall and individual nasal symptoms were significantly reduced after vidian neurectomy. The overall effective rate was 85.71%(42/49), showing a statistically significant improvement compared to preoperative scores(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was 10%(5/49). Further analysis found no statistically significant correlation between preoperative clinical indicators(both subjective and objective)and postoperative outcomes(P>0.05). Conclusion Vidian neurectomy provides substantial clinical benefit and a favorable safety profile for refractory AR. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the procedure does not appear to be influenced by patients' preoperative subjective symptoms or objective indicators.

Key words: Vidian neurectomy, Allergic rhinitis, Refractory, Efficacy evaluation, Safety

中图分类号: 

  • R765.21
[1] Wang XD, Zheng M, Lou HF, et al. An increased prevalence of self-reported allergic rhinitis in major Chinese cities from 2005 to 2011[J]. Allergy, 2016, 71(8): 1170-1180. doi: 10.1111/all.12874
[2] Stuck BA, Hummel T. Olfaction in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015, 136(6): 1460-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.003
[3] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 中国变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2022年, 修订版)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 57(2):106-129. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20211228-00828 Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Subspecialty Group of Rhinology, Society of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis(2022, revision)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 57(2):106-129. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20211228-00828
[4] 刘怀涛, 马瑞霞, 程雷. 难治性变应性鼻炎的外科治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(3):1-4. doi:10.6040/j. issn.1673-3770.1.2017.020 LIU Huaitao, MA Ruixia, CHENG Lei. Surgical treatment of refractory allergic rhinitis[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2017, 31(3):1-4. doi:10.6040/j. issn.1673-3770.1.2017.020
[5] 张淼, 杨颖超, 付指辉, 等. 自主神经功能紊乱与鼻科疾病关系研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5):142-148. doi: doi:10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.215 ZHANG Miao, YANG Yingchao, FU Zhihui, et al. Research progress in the relationship between autonomic nervous system dysfunction and nasal diseases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2023, 37(5):142-148. doi: doi:10.6040 /j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.215
[6] Lee JC, Kao CH, Hsu CH, et al. Endoscopic transsphenoidal vidian neurectomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268:851-856. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1482-x
[7] 余少卿, 王向东, 徐睿, 等. 变应性鼻炎的外科手术治疗专家共识(2022,上海)[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2022, 28(1):7-17. doi:10.11798/i.issn.1007-1520.202201001 YU Shaoqing, WANG Xiangdong, XU Rui, et al. Expert consensus on surgical management of allergic rhinitis(2022, Shanghai)[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Skull Base Surg, 2022, 28(1):7-17. doi:10.11798/i.issn.1007-1520.202201001
[8] Chu SD. Sixty cases of refractory allergic rhinitis treated by vidian trunk or branch neurectomy: a single-center observational study[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2022, 101(45): e31704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031704
[9] Su WF, Liu SC, Chiu FS, et al. Antegrade transsphenoidal vidian neurectomy: short-term surgical outcome analysis[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2011, 25(6): 217-220. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3704
[10] Jang TY, Kim YH, Shin SH. Long-term effectiveness and safety of endoscopic vidian neurectomy for the treatment of intractable rhinitis[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2010, 3(4): 212-216. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.4.212
[11] Su WF, Liu SC, Hsu WC, et al. Randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effect of vidian nerve cauterization on lacrimation[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2014, 28(3): 255-259. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4029
[12] Marshak T, Yun WK, Hazout C, et al. A systematic review of the evidence base for vidian neurectomy in managing rhinitis[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2016, 130(4): 7-28. doi: 10.1017/s0022215116008008
[13] Halderman A, Sindwani R. Surgical management of vasomotor rhinitis: a systematic review[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2015, 29(2): 128-134. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4141
[14] 李东, 陈彩娣. 改良鼻内镜下经鼻腔翼管神经切断术与鼻甲部分切除术治疗过敏性鼻炎的效果及其对复发的影响[J]. 中国现代医生, 2023, 61(8): 68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2023.08.015 LI Dong, CHEN Caidi. Efficacy of modified endoscopic transnasal alar canal neurotomy and partial turbinate resection in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and its effect on recurrence[J]. China Modern Doctor, 2023, 61(8): 68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2023.08.015
[15] Bleier BS, Schlosser RJ. Endoscopic anatomy of the postganglionic pterygopalatine innervation of the posterolateral nasal mucosa[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2011, 1(2): 113-117. doi: 10.1002/alr.20011
[16] Zhang H, Micomonaco DC, Dziegielewski PT, et al. Endoscopic vidian neurectomy: a prospective case series[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2015, 5(5): 423-430. doi: 10.1002/alr.21462
[17] Ai JG, Xie ZZ, Qing X, et al. Clinical effect of endoscopic vidian neurectomy on bronchial asthma outcomes in patients with coexisting refractory allergic rhinitis and asthma[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2018, 32(3): 139-146. doi: 10.1177/1945892418764964
[18] Shen L, Wang J, Kang X, et al. Clinical efficacy and possible mechanism of endoscopic vidian neurectomy for house dust mite-sensitive allergic rhinitis[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2021, 83(2): 75-84. doi: 10.1159/000511711
[1] 许雪萌,樊磊,喻望博,蒋芝月,潘晨,黄泳芹. 奥马珠单抗联合特异性免疫治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 26-33.
[2] 邹嵩,许保源,张金星,陈巧婷,李健祥. ABCLOVE嗓音训练法对声带良性增生性病变手术患者嗓音功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 32-37.
[3] 张竹萍,彭孜灿,肖振龙,李程,喻迪,王兴龙,陈伟,郭蓓. 新型鼻分泌物嗜酸粒细胞阳离子蛋白-髓过氧化物酶试纸在变应性鼻炎中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 129-134.
[4] 刘畅,杨景朴,高雨,王文佳. 长春地区儿童变应性鼻炎变应原检测结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 51-58.
[5] 周荷青,申琪. 中医药治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的生物标志物研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 168-176.
[6] 王曼娴,郑泉,杨亮. 细菌裂解物治疗变应性鼻炎的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 141-145.
[7] 刘畅,方宏艳,刘敩,富东娜,王贺,王晶,杨景朴. 长春地区秋季变应性鼻炎蒿属花粉致敏特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 13-19.
[8] 郑露,程杰,欧阳虹,池花明,杜敬东. A型血友病致难治性鼻出血1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 86-90.
[9] 曹影,邱月,陈智斌,费兵,李东,张晓凤,王惠,康欣乐,王海旭,怀德,李秀婷,束明阳. 难治性突聋耳后注射神经节苷脂联合鼓室内注射甲泼尼龙治疗前后言语识别率及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 15-21.
[10] 朱朗,刘志奇. 移动医疗提供的真实世界数据在变应性鼻炎治疗方案中的参考[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 135-139.
[11] 张静祎,董湘依,牟亚魁,宋西成. 细胞焦亡在耳鼻咽喉科疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 140-148.
[12] 张丽净,冯晓星,刘南仙,赵辉明,陈月华. 石墨烯养护鼻罩结合尘螨的皮下特异性免疫治疗在尘螨变应性鼻炎患者中的应用分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 26-32.
[13] 李浩,杨丽媛,张守凯. 鼻窦药物缓释支架在难治性鼻窦炎中的短期临床观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 38-42.
[14] 苏日古格,李花,乌日柴夫,韩额尔德木图,孟永梅. 基于网络药理学及动物实验探讨蒙药胡日查-6治疗变应性鼻炎的作用机制研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 41-51.
[15] 朱晗,刘雪霞,张华. 自噬在变应性鼻炎发病的作用机制研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 79-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!