山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 99-103.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.458

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

LASIK患者眼压测量的多因素分析

席玲,袁满红,过朵芳,杨华丽   

  1. 南华大学附属第二医院眼科, 湖南 衡阳 421001
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-03 出版日期:2017-04-16 发布日期:2017-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 袁满红. E-mail:348672759@qq.com

Influencing factors of tonometry of intraocular pressure following LASIK.

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, China
  • Received:2016-11-03 Online:2017-04-16 Published:2017-04-16

PDF (PC)

767

被引次数

2

摘要： 目的 通过分析近视眼人群准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)手术前后非接触式眼压值的影响因素,得出预测术后眼压值变化的回归公式,并对其进行效能检验。 方法 筛选行双眼LASIK手术矫正近视的病例235例,作左右眼自身配对实验设计,随机分组的前瞻性观察研究,分析影响LASIK术前术后非接触式眼压值的多种因素,探寻其规律,建立计算术后眼压值变化的多元回归公式,并检验其效能。 结果 术前非接触式眼压值与性别、眼别、年龄、角膜曲率无明显相关(P>0.05),与中央角膜厚度及等效球镜绝对值呈正相关。LASIK术后非接触式眼压变化值与年龄、角膜曲率、基质床厚度无明显相关(P>0.05),与术前非接触式眼压值、中央角膜厚度、等效球镜绝对值、消融深度、消融比呈正相关;逐步回归分析可得公式:非接触式眼压变化值=术前非接触式眼压值×0.552+消融比×0.158-6.219(R2=0.561, P<0.01)。经检验,运用公式所得非接触式眼压变化的预估值与实测值差异无统计学意义(t=-0.129, P=0.897)。 结论 LASIK术前非接触式眼压值与性别、眼别、年龄、角膜曲率无明显相关,与中央角膜厚度及等效球镜绝对值呈正相关;LASIK术后非接触式眼压变化值与年龄、角膜曲率、基质床厚度无明显相关,与术前非接触式眼压值、中央角膜厚度、等效球镜绝对值、消融深度、消融比呈正相关;术后眼压变化值可运用回归公式预测。

关键词: 眼压, 近视, 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术, 回归分析

Abstract: Objective To establish and validate the regression formula of intraocular pressure(IOP)by analyzing the influencing factors of IOP following laser assisted in situ keratomileusis(LASIK). Methods A prospective case study was performed on 235 myopia patients receiving LASIK. After self-contrast of randomized paired design, the influencing factors of IOP noncontact tonometer(IOPNCT)were analyzed. The multiple regression formula to forecast the changes of IOPNCT after LASIK was established and verified. Results The preoperative IOPNCT was not related to gender, dominant eye, age or keratometry of the patients(P>0.05), but positively related to the central corneal thickness(CCT)and absolute value of spherical equivalent. The IOPNCT changes after LASIK(△IOPNCT)were not related to age, keratometry or stroma bed thickness of the patient(P>0.05), but positively related to the preoperative IOPNCT, CCT, ablation depth, ablation rate(AR)and absolute value of spherical equivalent. The multiple linear regression formula of the IOPNCT changes after LASIK was: △IOPNCT = IOPNCT-preop×0.552 + AR×0.158-6.219(R2=0.561, P<0.01). After Verification by practical cases, there was no statistically significant difference between the estimated values and measured values of the IOPNCT changes after LASIK(t=-0.129, P=0.897). Conclusion The IOPNCT of pre-LASIK is not related to gender, dominant eye, age or keratometry of the patient, but positively related to the central corneal thickness and absolute value of spherical equivalent. The △IOPNCT is not related to age, keratometry or stroma bed thickness of the patient, but positively related to the IOPNCT of pre-LASIK, central corneal thickness, absolute value of spherical equivalent, ablation depth and rate. The values of △IOPNCT can be estimated by the regression formula.

Key words: Myopia, Intraocular pressure, Laser assisted in situ keratomileusis, Regression analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R77
[1] Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ophthalmol, 2014, 121(11):2081-2090.
[2] Nagaoka N, Jonas JB, Morohoshi K, et al. Glaucomatous-type optic discs in high myopia[J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(10):e0138825.
[3] 丁欣, 余晨颖, 艾凤荣, 等. LDV飞秒激光制作角膜瓣与角膜曲率相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2013, 27(4):32-35. DING Xin, YU Chenying, AI Fengrong, et al. Correlation analysis of LDV femtosecond laser flap and corneal curvature[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthal Shandong Univ, 2013, 27(4):32-35.
[4] Sales Sanz M, Arranz Marquez E, Pinero DP, et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on schiotz, goldmann, and dynamic contour tonometric measurements[J]. J Glaucoma, 2016, 25(4):419-423.
[5] Lam AK, Douthwaite WA. The effect of an artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the central corneal curvature[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1997, 17(1):18-24.
[6] 荣华, 崔红平, 杨海, 等. 影响高度近视患者眼压的相关因素分析[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2013, 34(02): 89-92. RONG Hua, CUI Hongping, YANG Hai, et al. Factors affecting introcular pressure in high myopic patients[J]. J Tongji Univ(Med Sci), 2013, 34(02):89-92.
[7] 翟英, 安建斌, 郭秀瑾, 等. 近视患者屈光度及性别与角膜中央厚度、角膜曲率和眼压的关系[J]. 第四军医大学学报, 2009, 30(11):1034-1036. ZHAI Ying, AN Jianbin, GUO Xiujin, et al. Relationship of different diopter of myopic eyes and gender with central corneal thickness, corneal curvature and intraocular pressure[J]. J Fourth Mil Med Univ, 2009, 30(11):1034-1036.
[8] Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study[J]. Ophthalmol, 2015, 122(3):471-479.
[9] Chihara E, Takahashi H, Okazaki K, et al. The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005, 89(2):160-164.
[10] Ohtani S, Ashizawa J, Samejima T, et al. Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements in Japanese myopic eyes[J]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 2012, 116(4):367-373.
[11] Silva TG, Polido JG, Pinheiro MV, et al. Application of corrective formula for intraocular pressure changes in patients that underwent LASIK[J]. Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 2011, 74(2):102-105.
[12] El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Coorpender SJ. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Refract Surg, 2001, 17(2):97-104.
[13] 张潇, 李莹. 近视及散光眼LASIK后非接触眼压计测量值的影响因素及其预测[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2008, 26(9):930-934. ZHANG Xiao, LI Ying. Influence factors and prediction of noncontact tonometry measurements after myopic and astigmatism LASIK surgery[J]. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol, 2008, 26(9):930-934.
[1] 朱希倩,王佳,孙祖贤,冯建秀,张梦佳,赵颖,王宏,姜敏敏. 上海市杨浦区2022—2024年6~9岁学龄儿童屈光状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 102-109.
[2] 孙凡敏,张娟美,高杰,赵军. 近视中Shh、PI3K/AKT、MMP-2通路及关联性研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 142-148.
[3] 黄巧,任毅,侯涛,廖行伟,朱子昂,詹晓琳,刘盈,尹时华. 鼻咽癌组织中EphB2表达及与临床病理特征的相关性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 26-30.
[4] 杜一帆,齐林嵩,李莹. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术对眼高阶像差影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 152-161.
[5] 杨臻,孟素坤,张纯. 单眼小梁消融术后对侧眼的眼压同感反应[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 43-51.
[6] 张莉苑,郭颖卓,陈蛟,王华,钟定娟. 650 nm低能量红光联合角膜塑形镜控制近视的临床效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 52-57.
[7] 王东芳,张清雨,宋继科,毕宏生. 基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单评价针刺防控儿童青少年近视随机对照试验的报告质量[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 66-79.
[8] 张金木,郭滨,蒋文君,刘冬梅. M受体信号通路在近视发生发展中作用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 160-164.
[9] 张莉苑,钟定娟,王华. 非手术的近视管理方法与脉络膜的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 149-153.
[10] 李飏,刘鸫,曹文捷. 红光治疗对近视儿童等效球镜度、眼轴长度及脉络膜厚度影响的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 74-81.
[11] 卢松,夏逸帆,李子晔,魏菁. 无视网膜脱离的儿童Stickler综合征1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 97-101.
[12] 胡亚柔,赵欣予,吴桢泉,范梓欣,余震,刘亚玲,陈婷毅,曾键,张国明. 早产儿屈光状态与眼部生物特征的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 144-150.
[13] 吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149.
[14] 买尔哈巴·玉素甫,克里木江·阿不拉,丁琳,秦艳莉,陈雪艺. 伴发于后巩膜葡萄肿的高度近视性白内障眼底病变相关研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(5): 107-114.
[15] 尤冉,郭笑霄,王薇,陈曦,王艳玲. 高度近视患者黄斑区视网膜劈裂分型与脉络膜特征分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2023, 37(3): 83-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发