山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 108-114.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.059

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

伴有幽门螺杆菌感染的咽喉反流患者的反流类型分析

刘小红,张青青,郭瑞昕,强茵,石瑶,杨皓楠,曹楠,加伟,谢萌   

  1. 西北医院)耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 陕西 西安 710004
  • 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 谢萌. E-mail:18392885196@163.com

Analysis of reflux types in patients with laryngeal reflux associated with Helicobacter pylori infection

LIU Xiaohong, ZHANG Qingqing, GUO Ruixin, QIANG Yin, SHI Yao, YANG Haonan, CAO Nan, JIA Wei, XIE Meng   

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xibei Hospital), Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China
  • Published:2024-12-13

摘要: 目的 探讨伴有幽门螺旋杆菌(helicobacter pylori, HP)感染的咽喉反流(laryngopharyngeal reflux, LPR)患者的反流类型。 方法 应用14C呼气试验和24 h阻抗-pH监测(24 h MII-pH),将所有LPR患者分为HP(+)的LPR患者(实验组)和HP(-)的LPR患者(对照组),实验组和对照组均行电子喉镜检查,并根据反流症状指数量表(reflux symptom index, RSI)、反流体征评分量表(reflux finding score, RFS)进行评分,分析比较实验组和对照组其RSI及RFS评分、反流总次数、酸性反流次数、非酸性反流次数及上述反流类型的差异。 结果 结合24 h MII-pH监测及14C呼气试验结果,54例LPR(+)患者中,实验组14例(HP+),对照组40例(HP-),HP感染率25.93%(14/54)。实验组和对照组其RSI(P=0.424>0.05)及RFS(P=0.382>0.05)量表总分及各项症状、体征发生率均无统计学意义(P>0.05),且咽喉部总反流次数(P=0.470>0.05)、酸性反流次数(P=0.207>0.05)及非酸反流次数(P=0.921>0.05),也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,实验组非酸反流比例显著大于酸性反流(57.14% vs. 14.29%,P+Non-acid=0.046),但混合反流和非酸反流、酸性反流之间均无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组混合反流和非酸反流比例均大于酸性反流(45.00% vs. 15.00%,P-Mix=0.003;40.00% vs. 15.00%,P-Non-acid=0.012),但混合反流和非酸反流比例无统计学意义(P=0.651)。 结论 与HP(-)LPR患者相比,HP(+)LPR患者其反流类型以非酸反流为主,咳嗽、假声带沟及喉内黏液附着等症状体征表现更加明显。

关键词: 幽门螺杆菌感染, 咽喉反流, MII-pH监测, 反流类型, 反流症状指数量表, 反流体征评分量表

Abstract: Objective To investigate the reflux types of Laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)patients with Helicobacter pylori(HP)infection. Methods According to 14C breath test and 24-hour impedance pH monitoring(24 h MII-pH), all LPR patients were divided into HP(+)LPR patients(the experimental group)and HP(-)LPR patients(the control group). Both experimental and control patients underwent electronic laryngoscopy and completed reflux symptom index(RSI)and reflux finding score(RFS). The RSI and RFS scores, the number of total reflux, acid reflux and non-acid reflux and the reflux types were analyzed and compared to explore the difference between the experimental group and the control group. Results Combined with the results of 24 h MII-pH monitoring and 14C breath test, 54 patients were LPR(+), including 14 cases HP(+)(the experimental group)and 40 cases HP(-)(the control group), and the infection rate of HP was 25.93%(14/54). In the experimental group and the control group, there were no significant differences in the total score of the RSI(P=0.424>0.05)and RFS(P=0.382>0.05)scale and the incidence of symptoms and signs(P>0.05), and there were also no significant differences in the total number of reflux(P=0.470>0.05), acid reflux(P=0.207>0.05)and non-acid reflux(P=0.921>0.05)between them(P>0.05). In the experimental group, the proportion of non-acid reflux was significantly higher than that of acid reflux(57.14% vs. 14.29%,P+Non-acid=0.046),while the ratio between mixed reflux and non-acid reflux and the ratio between mixed reflux and acid reflux were both no significant different(P>0.05).In the control group the proportions of mixed reflux and non-acid reflux were significantly higher than those of acid reflux(45.00% vs. 15.00%,P-Mix=0.003;40.00% vs. 15.00%,P-Non-acid=0.012), but there was no significant difference between mixed reflux and non-acid reflux ratio(P=0.651). Conclusion Compared with the HP(-)LPR patients, the main reflux type of HP(+)LPR patients was non-acid reflux, and the symptoms and signs of cough, subglottic edema and thick endolaryngeal mucus were more obvious.

Key words: Helicobacter pylori infection, Laryngopharyngeal reflux, MII-pH monitoring, Reflux type, RSI, RFS

中图分类号: 

  • R766.5
[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会嗓音学组.咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识(2022年,修订版)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 57(10): 1149 -1172. doi:10.3760/ cma.j.cn115330-20220711-00428
[2] O'Hara J, Fisher H, Hayes L, et al. 'Persistent throat symptoms' versus 'laryngopharyngeal reflux': a cross-sectional study refining the clinical condition[J]. BMJ Open Gastroenterol, 2022, 9(1): e000850. doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000850
[3] Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81(9 Suppl 2): 7-9
[4] Campbell R, Kilty SJ, Hutton B, et al. The role of Helicobacter pylori in laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 156(2): 255-262. doi:10.1177/0194599816676052
[5] Katra R, Kabelka Z, Jurovcik M, et al. Pilot study: association between Helicobacter pylori in adenoid hyperplasia and reflux episodes detected by multiple intraluminal impedance in children[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 78(8): 1243-1249. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.040
[6] 邵娜, 张青青, 刘小红, 等. 幽门螺旋杆菌感染对症状性咽喉反流患者唾液胃蛋白酶浓度的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 89-95. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.350 SHAO Na, ZHANG Qingqing, LIU Xiaohong, et al. Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on salivary pepsin concentration in patients with symptomatic laryn-gopharyngeal reflux[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(6): 89-95. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2022.350
[7] Zikos TA, Clarke JO. Non-acid reflux: when it matters and approach to management[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2020, 22(9): 43. doi:10.1007/s11894-020-00780-4
[8] Woodley FW. Superimposed non-acid reflux event: an example of when it may be important to revisit the impedance analysis guidelines[J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2022, 28(1): 165-166. doi:10.5056/jnm21172
[9] 孙喆喆, 吴玮, 王刚. 管腔内pH监测在反流性疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(6): 90-94. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.036 SUN Zhezhe, WU Wei, WANG Gang. Utility of intraluminal pH monitoring in reflux diseases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(6): 90-94. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2019.036
[10] Singh GB, Yvette War G, Shukla S, et al. The role of Helicobacter pylori and laryngopharyngeal reflux in recurrent tonsillitis[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 138: 110376. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110376
[11] Du PY, Zong SM, Wen YY, et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori and otitis media with effusion in children: a systematic review[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 135: 110091. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110091
[12] Flores-Treviño CE, Urrutia-Baca VH, Gómez-Flores R, et al. Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori based on the presence of cagA and vacA virulence genes in dental plaque from patients with periodontitis[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019, 14(2): 163-170. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2019.01.010
[13] Florou V, Karkos PD, Marini K, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux and olfaction disorders. Is there any connection? A scoping review[J]. Maedica, 2022, 17(2): 471-480. doi:10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.471
[14] Pokharel A, Mayya JP, Upadhyay HP. Comparison of proton pump inhibitor and triple therapy regimen for laryngospharyngeal reflux disease[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2020, 18(3): 513-519. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v18i3.2493
[15] Singh GB, Yvette War G, Shukla S, et al. The role of Helicobacter pylori and laryngopharyngeal reflux in recurrent tonsillitis[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020, 138: 110376. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110376
[16] Campbell R, Kilty SJ, Hutton B, et al. The role of Helicobacter pylori in laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 156(2): 255-262. doi:10.1177/0194599816676052
[17] Best LM, Takwoingi Y, Siddique S, et al. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 3(3): CD012080. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012080.pub2
[18] Tezer MS, Kockar MC, Koçkar O, et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux finding scores correlate with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori expression[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2006, 126(9): 958-961. doi:10.1080/00016480500529314
[19] Zhang QQ, Xie M, Guo RX, et al. The effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on salivary pepsin concentration in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 279(11): 5289-5297. doi:10.1007/s00405-022-07439-y
[20] Shen HL, Chen YJ, Li XH, et al. Impact of Helicobacter pylori infection and outcome of anti- Helicobacter pylori therapy in patients with reflux laryngopharyngitis[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 8266321. doi:10.1155/2022/8266321
[21] Flores-Treviño CE, Urrutia-Baca VH, Gómez-Flores R, et al. Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori based on the presence of cagA and vacA virulence genes in dental plaque from patients with periodontitis[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019, 14(2): 163-170. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2019.01.010
[22] Chang SH, Hsieh PL, Tsai GJ. Chitosan inhibits Helicobacter pylori growth and urease production and prevents its infection of human gastric carcinoma cells[J]. Mar Drugs, 2020, 18(11): 542. doi:10.3390/md18110542
[23] Lv YP, Teng YS, Mao FY, et al. Helicobacter pylori-induced IL-33 modulates mast cell responses, benefits bacterial growth, and contributes to gastritis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2018, 9(5): 457. doi:10.1038/s41419-018-0493-1
[24] Lechien JR, Saibene AM, Mayo-Yanez M, et al. Helicobacter pylori, laryngopharyngeal reflux and chronic tonsillitis[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2023, 44(1): 103665. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103665
[25] Astl J, Holy R, Maute E, et al. Genome of Helicobacter pylori and serotype of HPV detected in oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer and chronic inflammation patients[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(18): 9545. doi:10.3390/ijerph18189545
[26] Chen M, Chen J, Yang Y, et al. Possible association between Helicobacter pylori infection and vocal fold leukoplakia[J]. Head Neck, 2018, 40(7): 1498-1507. doi:10.1002/hed.25121
[27] Chen M, Fang Y, Cheng L, et al. Helicobacter pylori is associated with poor prognosis of laryngeal precancerous lesion[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2020, 47(2): 268-275. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2019.08.004
[28] Joseph NA, Mathews SS, Anandan S, et al. Lack of association of Helicobacter pylori in laryngeal pathologies[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 74(2): 2636-2642. doi:10.1007/s12070-020-02361-3
[29] Chen CC, Liou JM, Lee YC, et al. The interplay between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal microbiota[J]. Gut Microbes, 2021, 13(1): 1-22. doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1909459
[30] Li HJ, Hu YY, Huang YY, et al. The mutual interactions among Helicobacter pylori, chronic gastritis, and the gut microbiota: a population-based study in Jinjiang, Fujian[J]. Front Microbiol, 2024, 15: 1365043. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1365043
[31] Lahner E, Carabotti M, Annibale B. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic gastritis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(22): 2373-2380. doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2373
[32] Baj J, Forma A, Sitarz M, et al. Helicobacter pylori virulence factors—mechanisms of bacterial pathogenicity in the gastric microenvironment[J]. Cells, 2020, 10(1): 27. doi:10.3390/cells10010027
[33] Zhao T, Liu F, Li YJ. Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on esophageal motility, esophageal acid exposure, and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2023, 13: 1082620. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1082620
[34] Liu L, Gao HW, Wang HJ, et al. Comparison of esophageal function tests to investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 4791-4797. doi:10.12659/MSM.908051
[1] 吴玮,王磊,陈升,李连勇,王刚. 胃食管气道反流性疾病多学科研究及进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 1-14.
[2] 刘莲莲,李进让. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与咽喉反流[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 15-22.
[3] 张利,张梦茹,阿丽米热·艾尔肯,邱忠民. 咽喉反流性疾病在常见呼吸道疾病中的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 23-29.
[4] 胡志伟,陈冬,杨栋,吴继敏. 胃食管气道反流性疾病的诊断和治疗:基于2020~2024年相关共识和指南[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 30-38.
[5] 赵佳宁,崔元馨,王丹,赵明. 咽喉反流与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病的关系及其机制探讨[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 39-45.
[6] 张杉,陈秋,周方伟,马亦飞. 生物标志物在咽喉反流性疾病中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 46-54.
[7] 周诗侗,杨艳艳,杨玉成,方红雁. 胃蛋白酶与咽喉反流性疾病:从致病机制到咽喉鳞状细胞癌的潜在风险因素[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 55-60.
[8] 席晓宇,隋昕珂,陈升,李连勇,钟长青. 咽喉反流性疾病的内镜下治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 61-65.
[9] 牛燕燕,顾伟,金晓峰,霍红,杨大海,崔婷婷,王剑. 声带白斑组织中胃蛋白酶的表达分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 66-70.
[10] 王磊,王刚,孙喆喆,刘红丹,韩浩伦,李保卫,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 71-77.
[11] 崔小缓,尹龙龙,张延平,蒋兴旺,李丽娜. 咽喉反流患者唾液菌群与反流症状相关性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 78-84.
[12] 李逗,隋昕珂,杨小慢,郭红媛,王敏,钟长青,李连勇. 单纯咽喉反流患者食管下段黏膜细胞内镜及病理指标变化[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 85-90.
[13] 孙喆喆,王刚,王磊,李保卫,韩浩伦,刘红丹,张晓丽,吴玮. 咽喉反流性疾病不同体位反流模式的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 91-95.
[14] 魏鑫,邢东升,翟振伟,阎艾慧,刘振宇,曹弘薇. 妊娠期女性咽喉反流症状指数调查及影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 96-102.
[15] 李逢将,魏婕,刘红丹,张丽,赵伟超,武娜娜,王磊,吴玮,王瑞娟. 老年肺炎患者胃食管反流病和咽喉反流性疾病25例[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 103-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!