山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 43-45.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2013.319

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术后换药应用布地奈德混悬液的效果分析

张卫拾, 高刚, 钱茂华, 季超   

  1. 南通市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 江苏 南通 226001
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-23 出版日期:2014-08-16 发布日期:2014-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 高刚。E-mail：ggao200801@163.com E-mail:ggao200801@163.com
  • 作者简介:张卫拾。E-mail：122053535@qq.com

Budesonide used after functional endoscopic sinus surgery

ZHANG Wei-shi, GAO Gang, QIAN Mao-hua, JI Chao   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2013-12-23 Online:2014-08-16 Published:2014-08-16

PDF (PC)

828

被引次数

10

摘要： 目的 探讨在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者术后应用布地奈德混悬液（普米克令舒）的效果。方法 分析280例慢性鼻-鼻窦炎行鼻内镜手术的患者，随机分为2组，A组常规换药，术后常规使用布地奈德鼻喷剂喷鼻；B组对有囊泡及水肿明显者在术后换药过程中清理后予以明胶海绵浸润布地奈德混悬液置于囊泡及水肿部位，每周1~2次，观察术后1个月、3个月及6个月的疗效，包括VAS视觉量表主观评估及鼻内镜Lund-Kennedy客观评估。结果 A、B组术后1、3、6个月VAS评分分别为4.48±1.33，2.16±0.81，2.04±0.96；3.85±1.09，1.90±0.88，1.93±0.74。A、B组术后1、3、6个月Lund-Kennedy评分分别为11.44±1.73，4.51±1.05，3.94±0.86；6.82±2.08，4.26±1.17，2.17±0.79。两组患者的VAS评分在术后三个时间点差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）；术后3个月、6个月与术后1个月比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；而术后3个月与术后6个月相比，差异无统计学意义。两组间Lund-Kennedy 客观评估比较，在术后1个月和6个月两个时间点差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），而在术后3个月，两组比较差异无统计学意义；术后3个月、6个月与术后1个月比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；而术后3个月与术后6个月相比，A组在两个时间点差异有统计学意义，B组在两个时间点差异无统计学意义。结论 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻内镜术后应用布地奈德混悬液能更好地减少术后囊泡形成、减轻水肿，促进黏膜上皮化。

关键词: 鼻内镜外科手术, 布地奈德, 鼻窦炎, 慢性

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of Budesonide after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic nasal-sinusitis. Methods A total of 280 cases of chronic nasal-sinusitis(CRS) which underwent FESS were randomly divided into two groups: A group was regular dressing group with Budesonide nasal spray; B group was put gelatin sponge with Budesonide infiltration at vesicles and edema place in the post-operative dressing process, 1-2 times a week. Then we adopted VAS visual assessment and Lund-Kennedy assessment to assess the dressing effect after one, three and six months of FESS. Results The VAS scores and Lund-Kennedy scores of A and B groups at 1, 3 and 6 months were 4.48±1.33, 2.16±0.81, 2.04±0.96; 3.85±1.09,1.90±0.88,1.93±0.74 and 11.44±1.73, 4.51±1.05,3.94±0.86; 6.82±2.08,4.26±1.17,2.17±0.79. The VAS score at the three time points was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05); The VAS score of the 3 and 6 months was statistically significant with that of 1 month(P<0.05); while it was not statistically significant between the 3 and 6 months. The Lund-Kennedy score at 1 and 6 months was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05); The Lund-Kennedy score at 3 and 6 months was statistically significant (P<0.05); while between 3 months and 6 months, it was statistically significant in the A group, but not in the B group. Conclusion Budesonide after FESS of CRS can better reduce vesicle formation, mitigate edema and promote mucosal epithelium.

Key words: Nasal-sinusitis, chronic, Budesonide suspension, Functional endoscopic sinus surgery

中图分类号: 

  • R765.24
[1] 许庚, 李源, 谢民强, 等. 功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后术腔黏膜转归阶段的划分及处理原则[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 1999, 34(4):302-305.
[2] Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby Y, et al. The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Rhinology, 2007, 45(1):144-147.
[3] Lund V J, Kennedy D W. Staging for rhinosinusitis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1997, 117(3 pt 2):S35-S40.
[4] Berlucchi M, Castelnuovo P, Vincenzi A, et al. Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2009, 266(6):839-45.
[5] Wee J H, Lee C H, Rhee C S, et al. Comparison between Gelfoam packing and no packing after endoscopic sinus surgery in the same patients[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 269(3):897-903.
[6] 许庚. 非变应性持续性鼻炎(慢性鼻炎) 局部糖皮质激素治疗新概念[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 21(14):636-638.
[7] Albertien A C, Aukema M D, Paul G H, et al. Treatment of nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis wit h fluticasone propionate nasal drops reduces need for sinus surgery[J]. Allergy Clin Immunol, 2005, 115(5):1017-1023.
[8] Palmer J N, Kennedy D W. Medical management in functional endoscopic sinus surgery failures[J]. Curt Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2003, 11(1):6-12.
[1] 曹正勇,李小波. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并哮喘术后短程局部使用糖皮质激素辅助治疗的安全性和有效性[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 43-50.
[2] 孙艳,姚浩,顾黎安. 布地奈德联合盐酸氨溴索鼓室内注射治疗成人分泌性中耳炎的疗效研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(6): 77-82.
[3] 陈世琴,卫平存,胡云龙,胡金旺. 糖皮质激素三种不同鼻用法对鼻内镜术后黏膜转归的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(3): 195-201.
[4] 王海英. 鼻内镜下二线减张鼻中隔矫正术43例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 166-168.
[5] 陈国辉,和守睆,孙青,高天乐,白广平. 鼻内镜术中不同中鼻甲处理方式治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉效果比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 82-86.
[6] 李强,刘志元,周涵. 鼻内镜下蝶腭动脉阻断术治疗老年难治性鼻出血[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 92-95.
[7] 邱前辉,陈卓. 鼻内镜手术治疗首诊局部晚期鼻咽癌及放疗后严重并发症的作用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 17-20.
[8] 刘全,孙希才,于华鹏,赵可庆,张焕康,赵卫东,顾瑜蓉,李厚勇,王德辉,余洪猛. 鼻内镜下鼻咽癌切除术的手术分型[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 39-45.
[9] 赵丽娟,姜彦,于龙刚,蔡亮,陈敏,张继生,李志远,鞠建宝,李娜. 鼻咽癌内镜手术治疗临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2): 51-56.
[10] 余洪猛,刘琢扶,戴琪. 合并哮喘的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的鼻内镜手术治疗[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 38-41.
[11] 齐岩,刘俊其,彭舒娅,罗凯,张名霞,王振霖. 鼻内镜下选择性翼管神经切断术对伴有变应性鼻炎的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 109-113.
[12] 张伟,刘勇刚,江玲燕. 功能性鼻内窥镜术后慢性鼻窦炎患者短期布地奈德盐水盥洗疗效观察[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(1): 128-130.
[13] 李华斌, 赖玉婷. 慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的发病机制及诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 4-9.
[14] 郑雅霓, 刘鹤, 马亮, 张明生, 孙中武. 布地奈德联合生理盐水鼻腔冲洗对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效及对鼻腔分泌物IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 58-62.
[15] 张炜,曾昱菡,余先崧. 慢性鼻窦炎手术前后ECP、EGF、IL-6的水平变化及临床意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(3): 63-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发