山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 100-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.539
彭娇,钟定娟,陈蛟,左筠,王华
PENG Jiao, ZHONG Dingjuan, CHEN Jiao, ZUO Jun, WANG Hua
摘要: 目的 观察飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)后,光学区直径与暗瞳直径的关系对不同程度近视患者视觉质量的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2021年7月行SMILE手术矫治的近视及散光患者49例(96眼),18~35岁,平均(25.76±5.75)岁。依据手术光学区直径-暗瞳孔直径的差值分为3组:A组<0 mm(30眼)、B组0~1 mm(36眼)、C组>1 mm(30眼);各组内再依据术前等效球镜度(spherical equivalent refraction, SE)分为低中度近视组(<-6.00D)和高度近视组(≥-6.00D)。观察并且记录患者术前及术后3 mo裸眼视力(UCVA)、SE、角膜高阶像差、调制传递函数截止频率(MTFcutoff)、客观散射指数(OSI)、主观视觉质量问卷调查,其中角膜高阶像差包括角膜彗差、角膜球差及角膜总高阶像差。参数变化量用Δ表示,其计算方法为术后3mo参数数值-术前参数数值。 结果 术前基线三组间年龄、性别、UCVA、SE、角膜高阶像差、MTFcutoff、OSI及主观视觉质量等一般资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而光学区直径、暗瞳孔直径、光学区直径-暗瞳孔直径差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。术后3个月三组间UCVA及SE差异亦均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。对于角膜彗差、球差及总高阶像差,三组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05),两两比较均发现A组高于B组和C组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。三组内的角膜彗差、球差及总高阶像差均高于术前(均为P<0.05)。高度近视患者的Δ角膜球差组间的两两比较显示C高度近视组低于A高度近视组和B高度近视组,差异均具有统计学意义(P=0.045、0.047)。低中度近视患者的Δ角膜球差和Δ角膜总高阶像差组间的两两比较显示,A低中度近视组高于B低中度近视组,差异均具有统计学意义(P=0.003、0.006),B低中度近视组与C低中度近视组间差异均无统计学意义(P=0.464、0.962)。术后3个月时患者的MTFcutoff已经能恢复到术前水平(P>0.05),光学区直径与暗瞳孔直径差值小于0 mm时,术后3个月的散射指数较术前会有所增加(P=0.007)。A组手术前后的主观视觉质量评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),B组、C组术后的主观视觉质量评分[(7.53±3.81)分、(7.73±3.88)分]均低于术前[(9.75±4.05)、(11.00±6.35)分](P=0.002、0.003)。 结论 光学区直径大于暗瞳孔直径时,近视患者术后主观满意度明显提升,同时角膜彗差、角膜球差及角膜总高阶像差的增加均能相应减少;在此基础上,高度近视患者需要更大的光学区直径来减少术后角膜球差的增加。
中图分类号:
| [1] Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999, 127(1): 1-7. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00288-8. [2] Li MY, Zhao J, Miao HM, et al. Mild decentration measured by a Scheimpflug camera and its impact on visual quality following SMILE in the early learning curve[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(6): 3886-3892. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13714. [3] Qin B, Zhao J, Li MY, et al. The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19: 138. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1135-9. [4] 陈敬旺, 柯慧敏, 凌玲, 等. 不同程度近视患者SMILE术后有效光学区的研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27. CHEN Jingwang, KE Huimin, LING Ling, et al. Study on the effective optical zone after SMILE in patients with different degrees of myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2021, 21(11): 1968-1973. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.11.27. [5] Zhou JQ, Xu Y, Li MY, et al. Preoperative refraction, age and optical zone as predictors of optical and visual quality after advanced surface ablation in patients with high myopia: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e023877. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023877. [6] Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, et al. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(4): 230-237. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20190313-01. [7] Bühren J, Kohnen T. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(7): 1166-1174. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.098. [8] 夏艳云, 钟定娟, 王华, 等. 高能量加速型角膜胶原交联术对圆锥角膜眼表的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(6): 42-51. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432. XIA Yanyun, ZHONG Dingjuan, WANG Hua, et al. Effect of high-energy accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking on the ocular surface of keratoconus[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(6): 42-51.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.432. [9] Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, et al. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003, 110(12): 2285-2291. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.021. [10] Fraenkel G, Comaish IF, Lawless MA, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess subjective vision score in myopes seeking refractive surgery[J]. J Refract Surg, 2004, 20(1): 10-19. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20040101-03. [11] 文佰伟, 兰长骏, 廖萱. 视觉质量评价方法的研究进展[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. WEN Baiwei, LAN Changjun, LIAO Xuan. Research progress on visual quality assessment methods[J]. Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, 2017, 37(8): 793-796. doi:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0201. [12] Hao J, Li L, Tian F, et al. Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2016, 9(2): 292-297. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22. [13] Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, et al. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography[J]. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111(3): 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.022. [14] Bellucci R, Morselli S. Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2007, 18(1): 67-73. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121af1. [15] Artal P, Iglesias I, López-Gil N, et al. Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system[J]. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 1995, 12(10): 2358-2366. doi:10.1364/josaa.12.002358. [16] Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 127-137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033. [17] Yu MR, Chen MJ, Wang BJ, et al. Comparison of visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for mild to moderate myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(12): 795-800. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20151111-02. [18] Jun I, Kang DSY, Arba-Mosquera S, et al. Clinical outcomes of mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in low myopia with a large ablation zone[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(7): 977-984. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.007. [19] Kwon Y, Bott S. Postsurgery corneal asphericity and spherical aberration due to ablation efficiency reduction and corneal remodelling in refractive surgeries[J]. Eye(Lond), 2009, 23(9): 1845-1850. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.356. [20] Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling over 2 years in LASIK versus SMILE: a contralateral eye study[J]. Cornea, 2018, 38(3): 290-296. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000001821. [21] Mok KH, Lee VWH. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg, 2005, 21(2): 141-143. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20050301-07. [22] Luo J, Yao PJ, Li MY, et al. Quantitative analysis of microdistortions in Bowman's layer using optical coherence tomography after SMILE among different myopic corrections[J]. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(2): 104-109. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20150122-05. [23] Wu Y, Huang ZP. Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1): 46. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y. [24] 陈仪乐, 杨雅童, 陈嘉宝, 等. SMILE手术与V4c ICL植入术治疗高度近视的客观视觉质量比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23. CHEN Yile, YANG Yatong, CHEN Jiabao, et al. Comparison of objective optical quality between SMILE and V4c ICL implantation for correcting high myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2020, 20(7): 1222-1225. doi:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.23. [25] 赵旸, 傅艳燕, 吴小影, 等. 中低度近视SMILE术后超早期视觉质量变化的研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2020, 34(2): 42-46. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015. ZHAO Yang, FU Yanyan, WU Xiaoying, et al. Changes in visual quality during the ultra-early stage of SMILE for middle and low myopia[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2020, 34(2): 42-46.doi:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.015. |
| [1] | 朱希倩,王佳,孙祖贤,冯建秀,张梦佳,赵颖,王宏,姜敏敏. 上海市杨浦区2022—2024年6~9岁学龄儿童屈光状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 102-109. |
| [2] | 刘振,周维维,刘涵婧,张艺,朱玉广,朱艳. 人工晶状体Alpha角对连续视程人工晶状体眼视觉质量的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 47-53. |
| [3] | 孙凡敏,张娟美,高杰,赵军. 近视中Shh、PI3K/AKT、MMP-2通路及关联性研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(1): 142-148. |
| [4] | 陈涛,姜洋,李莹. SMILE矫正PRK术后屈光回退1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 148-153. |
| [5] | 杜一帆,齐林嵩,李莹. 飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术对眼高阶像差影响的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 152-161. |
| [6] | 张莉苑,郭颖卓,陈蛟,王华,钟定娟. 650 nm低能量红光联合角膜塑形镜控制近视的临床效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 52-57. |
| [7] | 王东芳,张清雨,宋继科,毕宏生. 基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单评价针刺防控儿童青少年近视随机对照试验的报告质量[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 66-79. |
| [8] | 张金木,郭滨,蒋文君,刘冬梅. M受体信号通路在近视发生发展中作用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 160-164. |
| [9] | 张莉苑,钟定娟,王华. 非手术的近视管理方法与脉络膜的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(4): 149-153. |
| [10] | 李飏,刘鸫,曹文捷. 红光治疗对近视儿童等效球镜度、眼轴长度及脉络膜厚度影响的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 74-81. |
| [11] | 卢松,夏逸帆,李子晔,魏菁. 无视网膜脱离的儿童Stickler综合征1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 97-101. |
| [12] | 李洋,马萍,张晗. 不同术式对青光眼术后角膜散光的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 137-143. |
| [13] | 胡亚柔,赵欣予,吴桢泉,范梓欣,余震,刘亚玲,陈婷毅,曾键,张国明. 早产儿屈光状态与眼部生物特征的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(3): 144-150. |
| [14] | 吴丽丽,曲毅. OCTA在病理性近视脉络膜新生血管应用及其在人工智能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(2): 144-149. |
| [15] | 王道光,马元孝,王玉成,任梦佳,蔡可丽. AT LISA 809M双焦点及Proming A1-UV单焦点人工晶状体植入术后视功能的对照研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(1): 39-45. |
|
||