山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 71-74.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2016.346

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

深圳小学高年级学生嗅觉功能的初步调查及与成绩的相关性初探

潘宏光1,王菊梅2,陈国威1,吴泽斌1   

  1. 1.深圳市儿童医院耳鼻咽喉科, 广东 深圳 518033;
    2.深圳市南山小学校医务室, 广东 深圳 518052
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-09 出版日期:2017-06-16 发布日期:2017-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 潘宏光. E-mail:1481717890@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市科技创新委员会资助项目(JCYJ20140416141331540)

Olfactory function in healthy senior grade students in Shenzhen city.

PAN Hongguang1, WANG Jumei2, CHEN Guowei1, WU Zebin1   

  1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Shenzhen Childrens Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong, China;2. Department of School Clinic, Shenzhen Nanshan Primary School, Shenzhen 518052, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2016-08-09 Online:2017-06-16 Published:2017-06-16

PDF (PC)

960

被引次数

1

摘要： 目的 探讨SniffinSticks在儿童嗅觉功能检查中的应用可行性。 方法 2015年4月至7月采用SniffinSticks法检测嗅觉正常的深圳某小学五、六年级小学生共70名,比较嗅觉评分与期末考试各科成绩的相互关联,探讨嗅觉记忆与学习能力的可能联系。 结果 选取对象中五年级30名,男17名,女13名;六年级40名,男22名,女18名。70名学生的SniffinSticks正常参考值是:气味阈值(OT):10.95±2.7,气味辨别值(OD):12.92±1.0,气味鉴别值(OI):13.74±1.6;嗅觉功能总分(TDI):37.54±2.2。男女间OT、OD、OI、TDI值差异无统计学意义,五、六年级间OT、OD、OI、TDI值差异亦无统计学意义。OT、TDI与英语成绩呈负相关(P<0.01)。 结论 SniffinSticks嗅觉检测方法能被较大儿童理解和接受,可用于儿童嗅觉测试。高年级男女学生嗅觉功能差异无统计学意义。

关键词: 气味, 嗅觉, 儿童, SniffinSticks检查

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of SniffinSticks test in detection of the olfactory function of children. Methods A total of 70 healthy volunteer senior students were chosen from the Shenzhen Nanshan Primary School from April to July in 2015. Afte detection, the relationship between olfactory function and learning achievement was analyzed. Results Of the 70 students, 30 were the Grade 5 group of which 17 were males and 13 were females, and 40 were the Grade 6 group of which 22 were males, 18 were females. The normal mean of odor threshold test(OT)scores was 10.95±2.7, the mean of the odor discrimination(OD)scores was 12.92±1.0, the mean of odor identification test(OI)scores was 13.74±1.6, the mean of TDI was 37.54±2.2. The differences of OT, OD, OI and TDI between boys and girls were not significant,and the differences between the Grade 5 and Grade 6 groups were not significant either. OT and TDI value were negatively correlated with the score of English achievement(P<0.01). Conclusion SniffinSticks olfactory detection method can be used for childrens olfactory function test. There was no gender difference in the olfactory function of senior students.

Key words: Children, SniffinStick test, Odors, Smell

中图分类号: 

  • R339.12
[1] Lenk S, Bluschke A, Beste C, et al. Olfactory short-term memory encoding and maintenance-an event-related potential study[J]. Neuroimage, 2014, 98(9):475-486.
[2] 倪道凤.嗅觉基础与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010: 62-67.
[3] Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, et al. “SniffinSticks”: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold[J]. Chem Senses, 1997, 22(1):39-52.
[4] Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, et al. Normative data for the “SniffinSticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2007, 264(3):237-243.
[5] Katotomichelakis M, Balatsouras D, Tripsianis G, et al. Normative values of olfactory function testing using the ‘Sniffin Sticks’[J]. Laryngoscope, 2007, 117(1):114-120.
[6] Sorokowska A, Schriever VA, Gudziol V, et al. Changes of olfactory abilities in relation to age: odor identification in more than 1400 people aged 4 to 80 years[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(8):1937-1944.
[7] van Spronsen E, Ebbens FA, Fokkens WJ. Olfactory function in healthy children: normative data for odor identification[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2013, 27(3):197-201.
[8] Yuan BC, Lee PL, Lee YL, et al. Investigation of the SniffinSticks olfactory test in taiwan and comparison with different continents[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2010, 73(9):483-486.
[9] Hummel T, Bensafi M, Nikolaus J, et al. Olfactory function in children assessed with psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2007, 180(2):133-138.
[10] Liu J, Pinto JM, Yang L, et al. Gender difference in Chinese adults with post-viral olfactory disorder: a hospital-based study[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2016, 27(4):1-6.
[11] Nováková L, Valentová JV, Havlícek J. Olfactory performance is predicted by individual sex-atypicality, but not sexual orientation[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11):234-244.
[12] Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, et al. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2000, 257(4):205-211.
[13] Chen G, Wei Y, Miao X, et al. Clinical features of olfactory disorders in patients seeking medical consultation[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2013, 19(6):444-450.
[14] Romanos M, Renner TJ, Schecklmann M, et al. Improved odor sensitivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder[J]. Psychiatry, 2008, 64(11):938-940.
[1] 冯思聪,于晓岚,娄丹. 基于囊泡组织Ki67、GM-CSF表达评估Messerklinger中鼻甲成形术对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉的效果[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 31-39.
[2] 赵春蓉,杨森,李春燕,王东海,杨宇,杨晓英. 持续正压通气治疗对中-重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者嗅觉及认知功能的影响[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 68-73.
[3] 朱希倩,王佳,孙祖贤,冯建秀,张梦佳,赵颖,王宏,姜敏敏. 上海市杨浦区2022—2024年6~9岁学龄儿童屈光状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 102-109.
[4] 辛敏,王少明. 炎症与感染性嗅觉功能障碍的神经免疫机制及治疗策略[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(2): 111-124.
[5] 宋艳玲,司元元,崔彦. 微量玻璃体切除治疗激光笔致儿童全层黄斑裂孔1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 144-147.
[6] 刘南仙,杨泽垠,韩琳,张爱英,赵宇亮,薛静,孙怡君,邵永良. 视频脑电图在儿童复发性眩晕诊断中的意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 20-25.
[7] 黄焕,华红利,邓玉琴,江承洋,王雨薇,杨星海. 儿童过敏性鼻炎、扁桃体腺样体肥大和鼻窦炎之间相关性及其对临床指导价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 34-41.
[8] 李晗,乔晓峰. 嗅觉训练改善认知功能的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 132-138.
[9] 王华,张丰珍,龙婷,赵靖,李宏彬,王生才,王桂香. 后颅窝肿瘤术后儿童气管切开原因及预后转归分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 168-173.
[10] 乐冰艳,邹剑,雷蕾,文巧,钱应雪. 儿童扁桃体微生物群与免疫调节及疾病关联[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 193-200.
[11] 黄爱萍,王娟,王丽,耿江桥,王亚芳,温鑫. 儿童原发扁桃体Burkitt淋巴瘤累及上颌骨和肺1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 148-152.
[12] 刘畅,杨景朴,高雨,王文佳. 长春地区儿童变应性鼻炎变应原检测结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 51-58.
[13] 付圣尧,陈敏,庞文会,李娜. 内镜辅助个体化手术入路治疗儿童鼻中线囊肿及瘘管[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 65-71.
[14] 李志成,闫亚,戴梁平,应俊杰, 王仁忠. 嗅觉障碍小鼠和大鼠模型的研究进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 158-167.
[15] 陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
网站版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》编辑部　
地址：山东省济南市山大南路27号（250100）电话：+86-0531-88366912 E-mail: ebhxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发