山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 26-29.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2021.214

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

吸入麻醉在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查中的应用效果及安全性评价

伊同英,王雪妮,韩旭东,白彩颖,吴岐珍   

  1. 甘肃省妇幼保健院 儿童支气管镜中心, 甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 发布日期:2023-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 吴岐珍. E-mail:wuqizhen8397@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省卫生健康行业科研项目(GSWSHL2021-018)

Application effect and safety evaluation of inhalation anesthesia in children's electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy

YI Tongying, WANG Xueni, HAN Xudong, BAI Caiying, WU Qizhen   

  1. Children Bronchoscope Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China
  • Published:2023-02-06

摘要: 目的 比较七氟醚吸入麻醉和表面局部麻醉在电子鼻咽喉镜检查过程中的应用效果。 方法 选择行电子鼻咽喉镜检查的1 006例患儿作为研究对象。在遵循个人意愿的基础上使用随机数字表法将患儿分为吸入麻醉组和局部麻醉组,每组503例。比较两组患儿内镜检查的FLACC疼痛评分、黏膜损伤发生率、不良反应发生率、医生操作感受评分、完成检查所需时间及二次进镜率。 结果 吸入麻醉组患儿行电子鼻咽喉镜检查其疼痛感受、黏膜损伤发生率低于局部麻醉组(P=0.002,P<0.001),且两组均未发生严重不良反应。吸入麻醉组医生操作感受及检查时间也优于局部麻醉组(P=0.042,P=0.026)。 结论 在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查过程中,吸入麻醉优于局部麻醉效果。

关键词: 儿童, 电子鼻咽喉镜, 吸入麻醉

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to compare the application effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and topical local anesthesia in electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy. Methods A total of 1 006 children who underwent electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy were selected. The participants were divided into two groups depending on the type of anesthesia(inhalational vs. local)they received. Next, a random number table was created, with 503 participants added in each group. The FLACC pain score, the incidence of mucosal injury, the incidence of adverse reactions, the doctor's experience score, the time needed to complete the examination and the rate of second entry were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of pain and iatrogenic injury among the children in the inhalation anesthesia group was significantly lower than that in the local anesthesia group(P=0.002,P<0.001). No severe adverse reactions were noted in both groups. Additionally, the doctor's experience and examination time in the inhalation anesthesia group were significantly better than those in the local anesthesia group(P=0.042,P=0.026). Conclusion For children undergoing electronic rhinopharyngeal endoscopy, inhalation anesthesia is more beneficial than local anesthesia.

Key words: Children, Electronic rhinopharyngoscope, Inhalation anesthesia

中图分类号: 

  • R762
[1] 林川耀, 陆玲, 张标, 等. 电子喉镜在咽喉部肿物活检中的临床应用及病理分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(9): 1-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.09.001 LIN Chuanyao, LU Ling, ZHANG Biao, et al. Clinical application of electronic laryngoscope in biopsy of throat and pathological analysis[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2018, 24(9): 1-6. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.09.001
[2] 姜岩, 高静. 单纯鼻腔表面麻醉在电子喉镜检查中的效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(11): 61-64. doi:10.12235/E20200114 JIANG Yan, GAO Jing. Clinical effect of single nasal topical anesthesia in electronic laryngoscopy[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2020, 26(11): 61-64. doi:10.12235/E20200114
[3] Morray JP, Geiduschek JM, Ramamoorthy C, et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: initial findings of the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest(POCA)Registry[J]. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93(1): 6-14. doi:10.1097/00000542-200007000-00007
[4] Brennan LJ. Modern day-case anaesthesia for children[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 83(1): 91-103. doi:10.1093/bja/83.1.91
[5] Tamvaki E, Efstratiou F, Nteli C, et al. Validation of the Greek version of comfort-B, FLACC, and BPS scales in critically ill children and their association with clinical severity[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2020, 21(5): 468-475. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2019.10.004
[6] Matsuishi Y, Hoshino H, Shimojo N, et al. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability(FLACC)Behavioral Scale[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194094. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194094
[7] 梁程程, 王欣, 雷大鹏. 电子鼻咽喉镜诊治27 400例临床分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(5): 107-110. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.579 LIANG Chengcheng, WANG Xin, LEI Dapeng. Electronic nasopharyngoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngologic diseases: a retrospective study of 27,400 cases[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2019, 33(5): 107-110. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2018.579
[8] 幸华兰. 护理干预在儿童电子鼻咽喉镜检查中的应用效果分析[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2016, 36(3): 474-475. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2016.03.051
[9] Jöhr M, Berger TM. Paediatric anaesthesia and inhalation agents[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19(3): 501-522. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.01.001
[10] 王燕, 顾建腾. 七氟醚的临床应用及代谢机制[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 30(8): 81-86. doi:103969/j.Issn.1674-8425(z).2016.08.013 WANG Yan, GU Jianteng. Clinical application status of sevoflurane and metabolic mechanism[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Natural Science), 2016, 30(8): 81-86. doi:103969/j.Issn.1674-8425(z).2016.08.013
[11] Nathan N, Vial G, Benrhaiem M, et al. Induction with propofol target-concentration infusion vs. 8% sevoflurane inhalation and alfentanil in hypertensive patients[J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(3): 251-257. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01717-2.x
[12] Abu-Shahwan I. Is sevoflurane and remifentanil induction of anesthesia safe in children with severe dilated cardiomyopathy? [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2008, 22(5): 744-745. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2007.06.002
[13] Shirley PJ, Johnston G. Sevoflurane induced atrioventricular block[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2001, 11(1): 125-126. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.0618e.x
[14] 陈宇, 熊利泽. 努力成为舒适化医疗的主导学科[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018(4): 385-386 CHEN Yu, XIONG Lize. Striving to become the leading speciality of comfort medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesilolgy, 2018(4): 385-386
[15] 李天佐, 米卫东, 黄宇光, 等. 把握历史机遇加速麻醉学科发展[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018(9): 1028-1030 LI Tianzuo, MI Weidong, HUANG Yuguang, et al. Seizing historic opportunity and enhancing development of the Anesthesiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesilolgy, 2018(9): 1028-1030
[16] 郭潇雅. 儿童舒适化医疗的昆明样本[J]. 中国医院院长, 2019,348(13): 70-71
[1] 朱希倩,王佳,孙祖贤,冯建秀,张梦佳,赵颖,王宏,姜敏敏. 上海市杨浦区2022—2024年6~9岁学龄儿童屈光状态分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(3): 102-109.
[2] 宋艳玲,司元元,崔彦. 微量玻璃体切除治疗激光笔致儿童全层黄斑裂孔1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(6): 144-147.
[3] 刘南仙,杨泽垠,韩琳,张爱英,赵宇亮,薛静,孙怡君,邵永良. 视频脑电图在儿童复发性眩晕诊断中的意义[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 20-25.
[4] 黄焕,华红利,邓玉琴,江承洋,王雨薇,杨星海. 儿童过敏性鼻炎、扁桃体腺样体肥大和鼻窦炎之间相关性及其对临床指导价值[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(5): 34-41.
[5] 王华,张丰珍,龙婷,赵靖,李宏彬,王生才,王桂香. 后颅窝肿瘤术后儿童气管切开原因及预后转归分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 168-173.
[6] 乐冰艳,邹剑,雷蕾,文巧,钱应雪. 儿童扁桃体微生物群与免疫调节及疾病关联[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(4): 193-200.
[7] 倪凌达,唐旭兰,孟丽丽,周慧群,苏开明. 电子鼻咽喉镜中I-scan各模式与白光模式的应用比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 19-25.
[8] 黄爱萍,王娟,王丽,耿江桥,王亚芳,温鑫. 儿童原发扁桃体Burkitt淋巴瘤累及上颌骨和肺1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(3): 148-152.
[9] 刘畅,杨景朴,高雨,王文佳. 长春地区儿童变应性鼻炎变应原检测结果分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 51-58.
[10] 付圣尧,陈敏,庞文会,李娜. 内镜辅助个体化手术入路治疗儿童鼻中线囊肿及瘘管[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(2): 65-71.
[11] 陈丹萍,何子键,虞幼军,周晓娓. 儿童突发性聋10年住院病例的疗效及预后相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[12] 杨娜,柳荫,郭宝,纪尧峰,成晨,张琛,董丽娜. 高频超声在儿童鼻骨骨折闭合复位术的应用研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 41-45.
[13] 王登茂,温鑫,耿江桥,张光远,刘晓峰. 儿童咽鼓管毛息肉合并鼻咽部错构瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2025, 39(1): 105-109.
[14] 姚婷婷,张德伦,李兰. 婴儿下咽部胃黏膜异位症引发咽喉反流症状1例并文献回顾[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(6): 126-130.
[15] 罗露,周恩,肖旭平,林志强,方志杰,吕晓虹. 等离子点状激发技术在儿童OSA扁桃体腺样体切除术联合围手术期快速康复中的应用[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2024, 38(5): 26-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!